Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154575›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2019

An enactive approach to appropriation in the instrumented activity of trail running.

Nadège Rochat, Ludovic Seifert, Brice Guignard, Denis Hauw

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadège RochatCETAPS Laboratory - EA 3832, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Rouen Normandy, Mont Saint Aignan, France. nadege.rochat2@univ-rouen.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-3736
Ludovic SeifertCETAPS Laboratory - EA 3832, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Rouen Normandy, Mont Saint Aignan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-5013
Brice GuignardCETAPS Laboratory - EA 3832, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Rouen Normandy, Mont Saint Aignan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-9629
Denis HauwCentre de Recherche en Psychologie de la Santé, du Sport et du Vieillissement (PHASE), Institute of Sport Sciences of the University of Lausanne (ISSUL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-9499
Centre d’études des transformations des activités physiques et sportives · FRHôpital Saint Roch · FRUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie 2014/0538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of external tools during a sports activity can be analyzed through the dynamics of appropriation. In this study, we assumed that appropriation could be documented at both the phenomenological and behavioral scales and aimed to characterize trail runners' interactions with five carrying systems (i.e., backpacks proposing different ways of carrying water) in an ecological setting. The runners ran a 3-km trail running loop, equipped with inertial sensors to quantify both their vertical oscillations and those of the carrying systems. After the trials, phenomenological data were collected in enactive interviews. Results showed that (1) the runners encountered issues related to the carrying system, whose emergence in their experiences while running revealed the interplay between the tool's transparency (i.e., when runners provided no account of the carrying system) and opacity (i.e., when runners mentioned perceptions of disturbing system elements), and (2) when the runners carried the water bottles on the pectoral straps, they felt the system bouncing in an uncomfortable way, especially in the less technical parts of the route. We therefore investigated the low- and high-order parameters of coordination by computing the vertical accelerations and the acceleration couplings between the carrying system and the runners in order to identify coordination modes. The congruence between the runners' experiences and the behavioral data was noted in terms of (1) the system's vertical oscillations (i.e., low-order parameters) and (2) the couplings between the accelerations of the runners and the backpacks (i.e., high-order parameters). Our results demonstrated that the appropriation process was shaped by the interactions between the runners' activity, the environment and the physical properties of the tool. These interactions occurred in fluctuating phases where the runners perceived the carrying systems as more or less incorporated. Our results highlighted how tool incorporation is revealed through changes in its transparency/opacity in the actor's activity.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleRunningAppropriationEnactionPhenomenologyTrail running

Identifiers

PMID31154575
OpenAlexW2947033949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.