Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154493›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2019

Dual-layer spectral computerized tomography for metal artifact reduction: small versus large orthopedic devices.

Christos Kosmas, Mojgan Hojjati, Peter C Young, Aidin Abedi, Ali Gholamrezanezhad, Prabhakar Rajiah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christos KosmasDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. christos.kosmas@uhhospitals.org.
Mojgan HojjatiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Peter C YoungDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aidin AbediDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ali GholamrezanezhadDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Prabhakar RajiahUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity of Southern California · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMetal artifacts limit the diagnostic utility of computerized tomography (CT) for implant-related complications. Dual-layer spectral detector CT imaging has been suggested for artifact reduction. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of spectral CT in artifact reduction in patients with small and large metal implants.

methodsIn this prospective study, patients with metallic orthopedic implants underwent CT imaging using a prototype spectral detector CT scanner. Conventional images were generated with iterative reconstruction at 120 kVp, and virtual monochromatic images were generated at 20-keV intervals between 40 to 200 keV. Conventional and monochromatic images were compared quantitatively using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and artifact improvement. Qualitative analysis was performed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists and included six image quality indicators.

resultsA total of 12 patients were scanned. In monochromatic images, as the energy level increased, the artifact size decreased progressively (p < 0.01). When conventional and monochromatic images were compared, maximum reduction was seen at 200 keV. Using qualitative assessments, 160 and 180 keV levels had the best overall diagnostic image quality. With increased energy level, there was improvement in qualitative ratings of bone-metal interface conspicuity (p = 0.002), degree of streak artifact (p = 0.010) and trabecular bone definition at 1 cm from implant (p = 0.023), and a trend towards significance for bone definition at 5 cm, soft tissue detail and overall diagnostic quality. Subgroup analysis revealed superior artifact reduction in small implants compared to large hardware. DISCUSSION: Our results support the utility of dual-layer spectral CT in metal artifact reduction. Virtual monochromatic images were diagnostically superior, especially for smaller implants. Virtual monoenergetic images at 160-180 keV are ideal for reducing artifacts.

Indexed as

ArtifactsOrthopedicsProstheses and ImplantsContrast MediaFemaleHumansIohexolIopamidolMaleMetalsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaIohexolIopamidoliopromideMetalsArtifactDual-energy computed tomographyDual-layer detectorHip replacement arthroplastyMetal implantSpinal instrumentationVirtual monoenergetic images

Identifiers

PMID31154493
OpenAlexW2947210820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.