Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154476›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics for adult patients with sepsis or septic shock: are current dosing regimens sufficient?

A J Heffernan, A Germano, F B Sime, Jason A Roberts, E Kimura

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A J HeffernanCentre for Translational Anti-Infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
A GermanoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringá Hospital, Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil.
F B SimeCentre for Translational Anti-Infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4061-2063
Jason A RobertsCentre for Translational Anti-Infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. j.roberts2@uq.edu.au.
E KimuraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Maringá Hospital, Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil.
The University of Queensland · AUUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BRGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVancomycin is commonly used for the management of severe infections; however, vancomycin dosing may be challenging in critically ill patients. This observational study aims to describe the population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock.

methodsA single-centre retrospective review of adult patients with sepsis or septic shock receiving vancomycin with therapeutic drug monitoring was undertaken. Blood samples taken 1 h after the vancomycin infusion cessation and 30 min prior to the next dose were assayed using the Vitros Crea Slide method. Vancomycin concentrations determined on different days were included. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using Pmetrics for R. Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using the final model.

resultsVancomycin concentrations were available for 27 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis or septic shock. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with inter-occasion variability of clearance and volume of distribution before and after 72 h adequately described the data. Creatinine clearance normalized to body surface area was included as a covariate on vancomycin clearance. The clearance and volume of distribution within 72 h of admission were 7.29 L/h and 54.20 L, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations suggested that for patients with a creatinine clearance of ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsVancomycin doses ≥ 2 g every 8 h in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock with a creatinine clearance ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineDrug MonitoringEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedSepsisStaphylococcusVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineVancomycinPharmacokineticsSepsisSeptic shockTherapeutic drug monitoringVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID31154476
OpenAlexW2947823423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.