Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154471›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Face memory deficits in subjects with eye diseases: a comparative analysis between glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration patients from a developing country.

Livia S Mazzoli, Carla N Urata, Niro Kasahara

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Refinement and preliminary evaluation of two tablet-based tests of real-world visual function.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Livia S MazzoliIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Rua Sao Mauro, 292, Sao Paulo, SP, 02526-050, Brazil.
Carla N UrataIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Rua Sao Mauro, 292, Sao Paulo, SP, 02526-050, Brazil.
Niro KasaharaIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Rua Sao Mauro, 292, Sao Paulo, SP, 02526-050, Brazil. niro.kasahara@fcmsantacasasp.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-0304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlder people present significant declines in face recognition with age. Spatial vision (high-contrast acuity) and age are the best predictors of face recognition. Visual disabilities are more common in the older population due to aging eye diseases. The purpose of the study was to compare the face recognition memory deficit between primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) patients living in a developing country.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, observational study. The sample comprised 64 patients with POAG, 48 with ARMD, and 52 controls. All groups were matched for age, gender, comorbidity, and ethnic distribution. Evidence of cognitive impairment was ruled out and subjects with even mild cognitive impairment were not included in the study. After a complete eye examination including measurement of the best-corrected visual acuity, fundus evaluation, and automated visual field, all subjects underwent the Cambridge face memory test (CFMT). CFMT score in percentage (%) was the main outcome measure and data were compared with ANOVA.

resultsThe mean age was 66.6 ± 9.2, 69.8 ± 9.3, and 63.4 ± 7.3 years, for POAG, ARMD, and controls, respectively (P = 0.152). Gender, ethnicity, and comorbidity were evenly distributed among the groups. The CFMT score was 53.3 ± 15.2%, 49.8 ± 14.2%, and 62.1 ± 15.9% for POAG, ARMD, and controls, respectively (P < 0.001).

conclusionARMD and POAG patients have higher face recognition memory deficit as compared to normal controls. This might be due to a visual disability.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesFemaleForm PerceptionGlaucoma, Open-AngleGonioscopyHumansIntraocular PressureMacular DegenerationMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedVisual FieldsAge-related macular degenerationFace perceptionGlaucoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.