Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154311›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Impact of legal status change on undocumented migrants' health and well-being (Parchemins): protocol of a 4-year, prospective, mixed-methods study.

Yves Jackson, Delphine S Courvoisier, Aline Duvoisin, Giovanni Ferro-Luzzi, Patrick Bodenmann, Pierre Chauvin, Idris Guessous, Hans Wolff, Stéphane Cullati, Claudine Burton-Jeangros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yves JacksonDivision of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-333X
Delphine S CourvoisierDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-2607
Aline DuvoisinInstitute of sociological research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Giovanni Ferro-LuzziHaute Ecole de Gestion, University of applied sciences of Western Switzerland, Carouge, Switzerland.
Patrick BodenmannDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pierre ChauvinDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Inserm, UMRS 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Paris, France.
Idris GuessousDivision of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hans WolffDivision of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stéphane CullatiInstitute of sociological research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Claudine Burton-JeangrosInstitute of sociological research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMigrants without residency permit, known as undocumented, tend to live in precarious conditions and be exposed to an accumulation of adverse determinants of health. Only scarce evidence exists on the social, economic and living conditions-related factors influencing their health status and well-being. No study has assessed the impact of legal status regularisation. The Parchemins study is the first prospective, mixed-methods study aiming at measuring the impact on health and well-being of a regularisation policy on undocumented migrants in Europe. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Parchemins study will compare self-rated health and satisfaction with life in a group of adult undocumented migrants who qualify for applying for a residency permit (intervention group) with a group of undocumented migrants who lack one or more eligibility criteria for regularisation (control group) in Geneva Canton, Switzerland. Asylum seekers are not included in this study. The total sample will include 400 participants. Data collection will consist of standardised questionnaires complemented by semidirected interviews in a subsample (n=38) of migrants qualifying for regularisation. The baseline data will be collected just before or during the regularisation, and participants will subsequently be followed up yearly for 3 years. The quantitative part will explore variables about health (ie, health status, occupational health, health-seeking behaviours, access to care, healthcare utilisation), well-being (measured by satisfaction with different dimensions of life), living conditions (ie, employment, accommodation, social support) and economic situation (income, expenditures). Several confounders including sociodemographic characteristics and migration history will be collected. The qualitative part will explore longitudinally the experience of change in legal status at individual and family levels. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Geneva, Switzerland. All participants provided informed consent. Results will be shared with undocumented migrants and disseminated in scientific journals and conferences. Fully anonymised data will be available to researchers.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandTransients and Migrantshealthmigrationpublic healthregularizationundocumented migrantwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID31154311
PMCPMC6549650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.