Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154292›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

GASS Trial study protocol: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised clinical trial comparing general anaesthesia and sedation during intra-arterial treatment for stroke.

Axelle Maurice, Jean-Christophe Ferré, Thomas Ronzière, Jean-Michel Devys, Aurelie Subileau, Marc Laffon, Bruno Laviolle, Helene Beloeil, SFAR research network

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02822144 (General Anesthesia Versus Sedation During Intra-arterial Treatment for Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02822144 phase3completednot on this map

General Anesthesia Versus Sedation During Intra-arterial Treatment for Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorRennes University HospitalRan2016 to 2020Enrolled351ConditionsStrokeArmsEtomidate, Succinylcholine, Propofol, Remifentanil, Lidocaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Axelle MauriceCHU Rennes, Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation, Inserm, NuMeCan, CIC 1414 and Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Jean-Christophe FerréDepartment of Neuroradiology, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Thomas RonzièreDepartment of Neurology, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Jean-Michel DevysService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Fondation Ophtalmologique, Paris, France.
Aurelie SubileauService d'Anesthésie Réanimation, CHRU La Cavale Blanche, Brest, France.
Marc LaffonService d'Anesthésie Réanimation 1, CHU Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Bruno LaviolleCHU Rennes, Clinical Pharmacology department and Inserm CIC 1414, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Helene BeloeilCHU Rennes, Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation, Inserm, NuMeCan, CIC 1414 and Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
SFAR research network
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment of acute stroke has drastically changed in the last 10 years. Endovascular therapy is now the standard of care for patients with a stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. The impact of the type of anaesthesia (general anaesthesia or conscious sedation) during endovascular therapy on the outcome of the patients is still a matter of debate. Previous studies are mostly retrospective and/or focused on the early postprocedure outcome and/or without blood pressure goals and/or single-centre small size studies. We therefore designed a multicentre study hypothesising that conscious sedation is associated with a better functional outcome 3 months after endovascular therapy for the treatment of stroke compared with general anaesthesia. METHODS/ANALYSIS: The General Anesthesia vs Sedation for Stroke (GASS) Trial is a randomised, parallel, single-blind, multicentre study of 350 patients undergoing endovascular therapy for the treatment of stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a general anaesthesia or a conscious sedation. The primary outcome measure is the modified Rankin score assessed 3 months after the treatment. Data will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: The GASS Trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Participant recruitment begins in September 2016. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02822144.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralEndovascular ProceduresProcedural SedationStrokeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind Methodadult anaesthesiaanaesthesia in neurologyendovascular therapyneurologystroke

Identifiers

PMID31154292
PMCPMC6550003
OpenAlexW2947843792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.