Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154045›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Quantitatively validating the efficacy of artifact suppression techniques to study the cortical consequences of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography.

Matthew J Boring, Zachary F Jessen, Thomas A Wozny, Michael J Ward, Ashley C Whiteman, R Mark Richardson, Avniel Singh Ghuman

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J BoringCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: mjb200@pitt.edu.
Zachary F JessenMedical Scientist Training Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Thomas A WoznyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael J WardDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ashley C WhitemanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R Mark RichardsonCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Avniel Singh GhumanCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USNeurological Surgery · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Predoctorial Training in Basic NeuroscienceT32NS007433 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MERINEY, STEPHEN D · 1998 to 2022
$8.0M
Inside the Social Perception Network: Dynamics, Connectivity, and StimulationR01MH107797 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GHUMAN, AVNIEL S · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Neural basis of local and circuit-level spontaneous and task-evoked hemodynamic brain activityR21MH103592 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GHUMAN, AVNIEL S, HUPPERT, THEODORE JAMES · 2016 to 2017
$424k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107797NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH103592NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and effective treatment for several movement disorders and is being developed to treat a host of neuropsychiatric disorders including epilepsy, chronic pain, obsessive compulsive disorder, and depression. However, the neural mechanisms through which DBS produces therapeutic benefits, and in some cases unwanted side effects, in these disorders are only partially understood. Non-invasive neuroimaging techniques that can assess the neural effects of active stimulation are important for advancing our understanding of the neural basis of DBS therapy. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a safe, passive imaging modality with relatively high spatiotemporal resolution, which makes it a potentially powerful method for examining the cortical network effects of DBS. However, the degree to which magnetic artifacts produced by stimulation and the associated hardware can be suppressed from MEG data, and the comparability between signals measured during DBS-on and DBS-off conditions, have not been fully quantified. The present study used machine learning methods in conjunction with a visual perception task, which should be relatively unaffected by DBS, to quantify how well neural data can be salvaged from artifact contamination introduced by DBS and how comparable DBS-on and DBS-off data are after artifact removal. Machine learning also allowed us to determine whether the spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity recorded during stimulation are comparable to those recorded when stimulation is off. The spatiotemporal patterns of visually evoked neural fields could be accurately classified in all 8 patients with DBS implants during both DBS-on and DBS-off conditions and performed comparably across those two conditions. Further, the classification accuracy for classifiers trained on the spatiotemporal patterns evoked during DBS-on trials and applied to DBS-off trials, and vice versa, were similar to that of the classifiers trained and tested on either trial type, demonstrating the comparability of these patterns across conditions. Together, these results demonstrate the ability of MEG preprocessing techniques, like temporal signal space separation, to salvage neural data from recordings contaminated with DBS artifacts and validate MEG as a powerful tool to study the cortical consequences of DBS.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAdultAgedCerebral CortexDeep Brain StimulationFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMachine LearningMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseSpatio-Temporal AnalysisSubthalamic NucleusVisual PerceptionDeep brain stimulationMagnetoencephalographyMovement disordersMultivariate pattern analysisParkinson's diseasePreprocessingTemporal signal space separation

Identifiers

PMID31154045
PMCPMC6688933
OpenAlexW2947232368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.