Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31153157›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy2019

The Therapy Process Questionnaire - Factor analysis and psychometric properties of a multidimensional self-rating scale for high-frequency monitoring of psychotherapeutic processes.

Günter Schiepek, Barbara Stöger-Schmidinger, Helmut Kronberger, Wolfgang Aichhorn, Leonhard Kratzer, Peter Heinz, Kathrin Viol, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Helmut Schöller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Günter SchiepekInstitute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Barbara Stöger-SchmidingerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Helmut KronbergerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Wolfgang AichhornInstitute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Leonhard KratzerDepartment of Psychotraumatology, Clinic St. Irmingard, Prien am Chiemsee, Germany.
Peter HeinzDepartment of Psychotraumatology, Clinic St. Irmingard, Prien am Chiemsee, Germany.
Kathrin ViolInstitute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-801X
Anna Lichtwarck-AschoffDevelopmental Psychopathology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4365-1538
Helmut SchöllerInstitute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many outcome measures and session-related questionnaires in psychotherapy are designed for weekly or biweekly administration. Yet, today, technical developments allow for higher frequency assessments to monitor human change dynamics more closely by daily assessments. For this purpose, the Therapy Process Questionnaire (TPQ) was developed, with a specific focus on inpatient psychotherapy. In this article, we present an explorative and confirmative factor analysis of the TPQ on the basis of the time series data of 150 patients collected during their hospital stay (mean time series length: 69.1 measurement points). A seven-factor solution was identified, which explains 68.7% of variance and associates 43 items onto the factors, which are "well-being and positive emotions," "relationship with fellow patients," "therapeutic relationship and clinical setting," "emotional and problem intensity," "insight/confidence/therapeutic progress," "motivation for change," and "mindfulness/self-care." The internal consistency (Cronbach's α), the inter-item correlations of the subscales, and the discriminative power of the items are excellent. The TPQ can be applied in practice and research for creating time series with equidistant measurement points and time series lengths, which are appropriate for the application of nonlinear analysis methods. Especially in clinical practice, it is important to identify precursors of phase transitions, changing synchronization patterns, and critical or instable periods of a process, which now is possible by internet- or app-based applications of this multidimensional questionnaire.

Indexed as

Psychotherapeutic ProcessesSelf ReportAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesfactor analysisnonlinear dynamicsprocess monitoringpsychotherapy feedbackTherapy Process Questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID31153157
PMCPMC6852168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.