Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31153001›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

Cortical lateralization of cheirosensory processing in callosal dysgenesis.

Myriam Monteiro, Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza, Juliana Andrade, Theo Marins, Erika de Carvalho Rodrigues, Ivanei Bramati, Roberto Lent, Jorge Moll, Fernanda Tovar-Moll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Myriam MonteiroThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil; The Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Uni-Rio), Brazil.
Ricardo de Oliveira-SouzaThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil; The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil.
Juliana AndradeThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil.
Theo MarinsThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil; The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil.
Erika de Carvalho RodriguesThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil; Augusto Motta University (UNISUAM), Brazil.
Ivanei BramatiThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil.
Roberto LentThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil; The Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Uni-Rio), Brazil; The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil.
Jorge MollThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil.
Fernanda Tovar-MollThe D'Or Institute for Research & Education (IDOR), Brazil; The Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Uni-Rio), Brazil. Electronic address: fernanda.tovarmoll@idor.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradoxical absence of a split-brain syndrome in most cases of callosal dysgenesis has originated three main hypotheses, namely, (i) bilateral cortical representation of language, (ii) bilateral thalamocortical projections of somatosensory pathways conveyed by the spinothalamic-medial lemniscus system, and (iii) a variable combination of (i) and (ii). We used functional neuroimaging to investigate the cortical representation and lateralization of somatosensory information from the palm of each hand in six cases of callosal dysgenesis (hypothesis [ii]). Cortical regions of interest were contralateral and ipsilateral S1 (areas 3a and 3b, 1 and 2 in the central sulcus and postcentral gyrus) and S2 (parts of areas 40 and 43 in the parietal operculum). The degree of cortical asymmetry was expressed by a laterality index (LI), which may assume values from -1 (fully left-lateralized) to +1 (fully right-lateralized). In callosal dysgenesis, LI values for the right and the left hands were, respectively, -1 and + 1 for both S1 and S2, indicating absence of engagement of ipsilateral S1 and S2. In controls, LI values were - 0.70 (S1) and - 0.51 (S2) for right hand stimulation, and 0.82 (S1) and 0.36 (S2) for left hand stimulation, reflecting bilateral asymmetric activations, which were significantly higher in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated hand. Therefore, none of the main hypotheses so far entertained to account for the callosal dysgenesis-split-brain paradox have succeeded. We conclude that the preserved interhemispheric transfer of somatosensory tactile information in callosal dysgenesis must be mediated by a fourth alternative, such as aberrant interhemispheric bundles, reorganization of subcortical commissures, or both.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgenesis of Corpus CallosumBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhysical StimulationSomatosensory CortexTouch PerceptionYoung AdultCallosal dysgenesisfMRI callosal agenesisSomatosensory cortical lateralization

Identifiers

PMID31153001
PMCPMC6541908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.