Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152589›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2020

A Preference-Based Model of Care: An Integrative Theoretical Model of the Role of Preferences in Person-Centered Care.

Kimberly Van Haitsma, Katherine M Abbott, Annabelle Arbogast, Lauren R Bangerter, Allison R Heid, Liza L Behrens, Caroline Madrigal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Examining Engagement Calendar Deviations in Assisted Living: A Focus on Residents With Dementia.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. "International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly Van HaitsmaCollege of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Katherine M AbbottDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
Annabelle ArbogastDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
Lauren R BangerterMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota.
Allison R HeidIndependent Research Consultant, Ardmore, Pennsylvania.
Liza L BehrensCollege of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Caroline MadrigalCollege of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Pennsylvania State University · USMiami University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
Assessing preferences for everyday living in the nursing home: reliability and coR21NR011334 · NINR · POLISHER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VANHAITSMA, KIMBERLY S · 2011 to 2012
$448k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of individuals' everyday preferences is a cornerstone of person-centered care (PCC). Initial evidence demonstrates the positive impact of honoring preferences in care for older adults receiving long-term services and supports (LTSS). Yet, the mechanisms through which preference-based care affects individual well-being remain poorly understood. This article proposes a theoretical model of PCC entitled the Preference-Based Model of Care that integrates the Theory of Human Motivation, Self-determination Theory, the Competence-Press Model of person and environment fit, the Living Systems Framework, and the Broaden-and-Build theory of positive emotions to deepen our understanding of the processes through which preference-based care affects well-being among older adults receiving LTSS. The Preference-Based Model of Care illustrates how goal-directed behaviors facilitate need fulfillment through the expression of individual preferences and how these behaviors mediate the relationship between person-environment fit and affect balance within a particular social, cultural, and political context. The Preference-Based Model of Care can advance research on PCC in LTSS and can inform LTSS clinical practice guidelines for older adults, regardless of functional or cognitive capacity.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPatient-Centered CareAgedHomes for the AgedHumansLong-Term CareNursing HomesPatient PreferenceLong-term carePerson–environment fitPreference-based careTheory

Identifiers

PMID31152589
PMCPMC7117623
OpenAlexW2946951186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.