SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Lithium for acute mania.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological treatment for bipolar mania: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- No Evidence of Moderated Impulsivity Following Administration of the IMPase Inhibitor Ebselen in Healthy Adults.Human psychopharmacology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Orlistat for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: an eight-week multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Trial
- Cellular and proteomic differences associated with lithium response in olfactory neuroepithelium cells of bipolar disorder patients.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Short-term and long-term effects of Muslim fasting on lithium pharmacokinetics and renal function in bipolar disorder: a prospective observational study.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Review
- New Advances in the Pharmacology and Toxicology of Lithium: A Neurobiologically Oriented Overview.Pharmacological reviews · 2024Review
- Correlation of theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Prediction of medical admissions after psychiatric inpatient hospitalization in bipolar disorder: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Does circadian dysrhythmia drive the switch into high- or low-activation states in bipolar I disorder?Bipolar disorders · 2023Review
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of antimanic drugs for the treatment of acute mania used in Japan.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2022Review
- Li-Doped Bioactive Ceramics: Promising Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Lithium produces bi-directionally regulation of mood disturbance, acts synergistically with anti-depressive/-manic agents, and did not deteriorate the cognitive impairment in murine model of bipolar disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Lithium bidirectionally regulates depression- and mania-related brain functional alterations without worsening cognitive function in patients with bipolar disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Effect of online aerobic exercise training in patients with bipolar depression: Protocol of a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Lithium Chloride Protects against Sepsis-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and Cancer Cachexia.Cells · 2021Article
- Acute and Long Term Treatment of Manic Episodes in Bipolar Disorder.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2021Review
- Lithium Treatment Over the Lifespan in Bipolar Disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Review
- Valproate for acute mania.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBipolar disorder is a common condition associated with high morbidity; developing efficacious, safe treatments is therefore essential. Lithium is an effective maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder. It acts as mood stabiliser and reduces the risk of suicide. However, evidence assessing the efficacy of lithium in the treatment of acute mania is less robust. Current evidence-based guidelines cite multiple anti-dopaminergic and mood-stabilising agents as initial treatments: more definite evidence is needed to decide if lithium should be the first-line therapy.
objectives1. To assess the effects of lithium in comparison with placebo or other active treatment in alleviating the acute symptoms of a manic or mixed episode in people with bipolar disorder.2. To review the acceptability and tolerability of treatment with lithium in comparison with placebo or other active treatments in alleviating the acute symptoms of a manic or mixed episode in people with bipolar disorder. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. We also searched the World Health Organization trials portal (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov. We checked the reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews. We have incorporated studies from searches to 18 May 2018 into the current analyses. SELECTION CRITERIA: Prospective randomised controlled studies comparing lithium with placebo or alternative drug treatment in treatment of acute mania. We included anyone with bipolar disorder, male and female, of any age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. We used odds ratios (ORs) to analyse binary efficacy outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuously distributed outcomes. We used a fixed-effect model unless heterogeneity was moderate or substantial, in which case we used a random-effects model. We used Review Manager 5 to analyse data. We assessed the certainty of evidence for individual outcomes using the GRADE approach. MAIN
resultsWe found 36 randomised controlled studies comparing lithium with placebo, one of 12 drugs, or electroconvulsive therapy for treatment of acute mania. Studies included male and female participants (n = 4220), of all ages, who all fitted criteria for a manic episode within the context of a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.Risk of bias was variable; 12 studies had a high risk of bias in one domain and 27 gave inadequate information on randomisation leading to an 'unclear' rating for selection bias.Lithium versus placeboHigh-certainty evidence found that lithium was an effective treatment for acute mania and was more effective than placebo at inducing a response (OR 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73 to 2.63; participants = 1707; studies = 6; I AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis systematic review indicates that lithium is more effective than placebo as a treatment for acute mania but increases the risk for somnolence and tremor. Limited evidence suggests little or no difference between lithium and other mood stabilisers (valproate, carbamazepine) or antipsychotics (risperidone, quetiapine, haloperidol). Olanzapine may be an exception, as it is probably slightly more effective than lithium. There is uncertain evidence that risperidone may also be more effective than lithium. Lithium is probably more effective at treating acute mania than topiramate. When compared to placebo, lithium was more likely to cause adverse events. However, when compared to other drugs, too few studies provided data on adverse effects to provide high-certainty evidence. More, rigorously designed, large-scale studies are needed to definitively conclude if lithium is superior to other interventions in treating acute mania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.