Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152367›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2019

Association between tea consumption and risk of cancer: a prospective cohort study of 0.5 million Chinese adults.

Xinyi Li, Canqing Yu, Yu Guo, Zheng Bian, Zewei Shen, Ling Yang, Yiping Chen, Yongyue Wei, Hao Zhang, Zhe Qiu and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrating Salivary Biomarkers CST4 andClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Oral Health and Nutraceutical Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Xinyi LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Canqing YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yu GuoChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zheng BianChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zewei ShenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ling YangClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Yiping ChenClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Yongyue WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hao ZhangLiuyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Liuyang, Hunan, China.
Zhe QiuLiuyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Liuyang, Hunan, China.
Junshi ChenChina National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, China.
Feng ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhengming ChenClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jun LvDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China. lvjun@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7916-3870
Liming LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China. lmleeph@vip.163.com.
China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNUniversity of Oxford · GBChina National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment · CNHarvard University · USNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U137686851Medical Research Council MC_UU_00017/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12026/2Wellcome Trust 088158/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 104085/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 202922/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 212946/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current experimental and epidemiological studies provide inconsistent evidence toward the association between tea consumption and cancer incidence. We investigated whether tea consumption was associated with the incidence of all cancers and six leading types of cancer (lung cancer, stomach cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, female breast cancer and cervix uteri cancer) among 455,981 participants aged 30-79 years in the prospective cohort China Kadoorie Biobank. Tea consumption was assessed at baseline (2004-2008) with an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Cancer cases were identified by linkage to the national health insurance system. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the present population, daily tea consumers were more likely to be current smokers and daily alcohol consumers. 22,652 incident cancers occurred during 10.1 years follow-up (5.04 cases/1000 person-years). When we restricted analyses to non-smokers and non-excessive alcohol consumers to minimize confounding, tea consumption was not associated with all cancers (daily consumers who added tea leaves > 4.0 g/day vs. less-than-weekly consumers: HR, 1.03; 95%CI, 0.93-1.13), lung cancer (HR, 1.08; CI, 0.84-1.40), colorectal cancer (HR, 1.08; CI, 0.81-1.45) and liver cancer (HR, 1.08; CI, 0.75-1.55), yet might be associated with increased risk of stomach cancer (HR, 1.46; CI, 1.07-1.99). In both less-than-daily and daily tea consumers, all cancer risk increased with the amount of tobacco smoked or alcohol consumed. Our findings suggest tea consumption may not provide preventive effect against cancer incidence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingAsian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsCaffeineChinaColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsCaffeineTeaBreast cancerCancerCervix uteri cancerColorectal cancerLiver cancerLung cancerProspective cohort studyStomach cancerTea consumption

Identifiers

PMID31152367
PMCPMC6602977
OpenAlexW2947710963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.