Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152361›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Primary Care Patients' and Providers' Perspectives about an Online Weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study.

Ronen Rozenblum, Barbara A De La Cruz, Nyryan V Nolido, Ihorma Adighibe, Kristina Secinaro, Katherine D McManus, Florencia Halperin, Jason P Block, David W Bates, Heather J Baer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02656693 (Integrating Online Weight Management With Primary Care Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02656693 nacompletednot on this map

Integrating Online Weight Management With Primary Care Support: Patient-Centered Strategies for Addressing Overweight and Obesity in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled840ConditionsObesityArmsOnline weight management program, Population health management support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ronen RozenblumBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. rrozenblum@bwh.harvard.edu.
Barbara A De La CruzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nyryan V NolidoBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ihorma AdighibeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kristina SecinaroBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine D McManusBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Florencia HalperinBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason P BlockBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David W BatesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Heather J BaerBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers (PCPs) often take the lead role in caring for patients with overweight and obesity; however, few PCPs counsel patients about weight loss. Online weight management programs that are integrated within primary care may help address this gap in care.

objectiveTo identify perceptions of and experience with online weight management programs in general and with a proposed online program, to identify barriers to use, and to improve the design and content of our intervention, which included an online program plus population health management (PHM) support from primary care practices.

designA mixed qualitative methods study including three patient focus groups and seven semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers.

participantsA total of 13 adult patients (age range, 20-70) with body mass index (BMI) 27-35 kg/m MAIN MEASURES: We developed and used semi-structured focus groups and interview guides. The focus group and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using grounded theory, we analyzed the transcripts to identify and extract common concepts and themes. KEY

resultsAlthough patients and healthcare providers expressed positive opinions about online weight management programs, few patients had experience with them, and providers stated that such programs are not being widely implemented in primary care settings. Some participants highlighted the flexibility and low cost as strengths of online weight management tools compared with in-person programs. All participants had favorable opinions about our proposed intervention and were overwhelmingly positive about the combination of an online program and PHM support.

conclusionsThis study highlights the potential value of online weight management programs and PHM support in primary care. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02656693.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedObesityPatient PreferencePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchWeight Reduction ProgramsYoung Adultobesityonline programoverweightprimary careweight management

Identifiers

PMID31152361
PMCPMC6667547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.