Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152332›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2019

Second-Generation Biomarker Testing for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Using Plasma Anti-CdtB and Anti-Vinculin Levels.

Walter Morales, Ali Rezaie, Gillian Barlow, Mark Pimentel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A real-world assessment of healthcare resource utilization following IBS-SmartFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. A review of chronic enterocolitis of rhesus macaques (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walter MoralesMedically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite 240E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Ali RezaieMedically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite 240E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Gillian BarlowMedically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite 240E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Mark PimentelMedically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite 240E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. pimentelm@cshs.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0619-5115
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundELISA testing for anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin can discriminate patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) from those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, recent findings suggest the antigens can suffer from epitope instability.

aimThis study aimed to assess effects of incorporating epitope stabilization on test characteristics for distinguishing IBS-D from IBD subjects.

methodsPlasma samples from IBS-D subjects from a large-scale clinical trial and subjects with endoscopically active IBD without concurrent immunomodulator therapy were used. After epitope stabilization, CdtB and vinculin were used in ELISA testing. Optical density readings were compared between IBS-D and IBD subjects.

resultsSamples from 100 IBS-D and 31 IBD (22 UC and 9 CD) subjects were tested. IBS-D subjects had higher anti-CdtB titers (P = 0.0001) and higher anti-vinculin titers (P = 0.004) than IBD subjects. The specificities of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin to differentiate IBS-D from IBD were 93.5% and 90.9%, respectively, with sensitivities of 43.0% and 52.2%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios of identifying IBS-D with anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin were 6.7 and 5.7, respectively. Assuming a pretest probability of 57% for diagnosis of IBS-D in patients with abdominal pain and change in bowel habits, testing positive for both antibodies resulted in a posttest probability of > 98%.

conclusionsPerforming epitope stabilization for CdtB and vinculin enhances the test characteristics of ELISAs for anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin in discriminating IBS-D from IBD. Measurement of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin with this second-generation methodology may further advance our understanding of the role of immunity in functional bowel diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAutoantibodiesBacterial ToxinsBiomarkersCohort StudiesDiarrheaEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedVinculinAutoantibodiesBacterial ToxinsBiomarkerscytolethal distending toxinVCL protein, humanVinculinCytolethal distending toxinDiagnostic testingEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayEpitope stabilizationIrritable bowel syndromeVinculin

Identifiers

PMID31152332
OpenAlexW2947023759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.