Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152283›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2020

Relations among Perceptions of Neighborhood Cohesion and Control and Parental Monitoring across Adolescence.

Jaime M Booth, Daniel S Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaime M BoothUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work, 4200 5th Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA. jmbooth@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-4284
Daniel S ShawDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 210S Bouquet Street, 4101 Sennott Square, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

Funding

Neighborhood risk and protection for substance use among low income adolescentsK01DA041468 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BOOTH, JAIME MICHELLE · 2017 to 2021
$848k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA041468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social disorganization theory argues that disadvantaged neighborhoods will have less cohesion and control, and therefore will be less conducive to effective parental monitoring. This study aims to test these relationships using four waves of the Pitt Mother and Child Project (ages 11, 12, 15, and 17). The sample consists of 185 low-income males and their parents, 56.44% of whom identify as White, and 34.67% of whom identify African American. Crossed-lagged path models were estimated and the indirect effect of neighborhood disadvantage on parental monitoring through neighborhood cohesion and control was estimated. Separate models were estimated for parental and adolescent perceptions of parental monitoring. The results demonstrate a positive relationship between parental perception of neighborhood social cohesion and parental monitoring, and a negative relationship found between parental perceptions of neighborhood social control and parental monitoring in both models. The findings of this study suggests that neighborhoods may be an important target for interventions that are aiming to improve parental monitoring and ultimately adolescent outcomes.

Indexed as

Internal-External ControlParent-Child RelationsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultBlack or African AmericanChildFemaleHumansMaleMothersParentsResidence CharacteristicsSocial EnvironmentSocioeconomic FactorsWhite PeopleAdolescenceCross lagged modelNeighborhood cohesionNeighborhood social controlParental monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31152283
PMCPMC7477754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.