ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019
Bullet wipe on the uppermost textile layer of gunshot entrance sites: may it be absent due to pre-existing blood staining?
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arrow entrance wounds with blackened margins simulating bullet wipe.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Autopsy findings in victims of gunshot injuries: wound ballistic considerations based on test shots to simulants and composite models.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
- Interpol Review of Gunshot Residue 2019 to 2021.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most gunshot entrance sites on human victims are localized in clothed body regions. Except for the use of lead-free ammunition, a positive color reaction of the sodium rhodizonate test indicates a primary target hit by the bullet. Any lead residue pattern in the area around the entrance hole allows approximate conclusions as to the firing distance in close and intermediate range shots, whereas the presence of a bullet wipe denotes an entrance site. A criminal case gave rise to an experimental study to clarify whether a blood-soaked garment being shot at as a primary target may lack a bullet wipe around the entrance hole. Distant-range shots were fired with a semi-automatic pistol (Heckler & Koch, Mod. USP Compact, cal. 9-mm Luger) using cartridges with jacketed round-nose bullets and a Sinoxid primer containing lead styphnate. In fabrics saturated with fluid blood, a wide area around the bullet entrance was densely covered with rhodizonate-positive microparticles simulating gunshot residues (GSR) from a close-range shot. In shots to fabrics oversaturated with blood, a typical bullet wipe was lacking, whereas lead-containing particles were spotted in the periphery. The results are discussed with respect to the aberrant appearance of bullet entrance sites in blood-soaked fabrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.