Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152264›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Distribution of carbapenem resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Annalisa De Rosa, Nico T Mutters, Claudio M Mastroianni, Stefan J Kaiser, Frank Günther

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Efficiency and Usefulness of the Molecular Test 'BiofireAnnals of burns and fire disasters · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  4. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  5. Genomic characterization of carbapenem-non-susceptibleEmerging microbes & infections · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular surveillance of carbapenemase-producingAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annalisa De RosaCentre for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nico T MuttersCentre for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudio M MastroianniDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stefan J KaiserCentre for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank GüntherCentre for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. frank.guenther@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-0950
Heidelberg University · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DESapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Württemberg (MWK) Surveillance von Mehrfach-Antibiotika-Resistenzen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aims to define the epidemiology of carbapenem resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). We evaluated 11,457 clinical PA strains isolated between 2009 and 2015 at the tertiary care University Hospital in Heidelberg, Germany. Thirty-four percent of the isolates (3867/11,457) were MDR (multidrug-resistant), 16% (1816/11,457) were XDR (extensively drug resistant), and less than 1% (82/11,457) had a PDR (pandrug-resistant) profile. Of those, 23% carried a carbapenemase gene (CPM positive) with 12% VIM-2, 10% VIM-1, and less than 1% IMP-1. Comparing MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) distributions, the mean rank for meropenem, imipenem, gentamicin, and fosfomycin was significantly higher in the CPM-positive group than in the CPM-negative XDR group (p ≤ 0.004). oprD (outer membrane protein) mutations were found in 19/19 tested strains; 12/19 carried a CPM and had a higher mutation rate. Meropenem resistance was mostly associated with the presence of CPM. Only 1/19 strains was meropenem resistant in the absence of CPM genes; nevertheless, it carried an oprD mutation in a strategic site (loop 2). Of 19 CPM-negative strains tested, 7 (36%) showed EP (efflux pumps) hyperexpression versus 12 in the CPM-positive strains. In our study, nearly 50% of the PA isolates exhibited resistance to the tested first-line antibiotics. Our study also demonstrates that carbapenemase genes can be isolated in approximately 23% of XDR PA strains in our population. This finding supports the clinical relevance of PA driven by the possible presence of multiple resistance mechanisms acquired under exposure to antibiotics or by horizontal transfer of resistance genes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGermanyHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationPorinsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsMembrane Transport ProteinsOprD protein, Pseudomonas aeruginosaPorinsCarbapenemasesEfflux pumpsMDRoprDPseudomonas aeruginosaXDR

Identifiers

PMID31152264
OpenAlexW2947806519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.