Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152233›Full record

ReviewParasitology research2019

Anticoccidial drugs of the livestock industry.

Sandra Noack, H David Chapman, Paul M Selzer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A century of "anticoccidial drugs": bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The history of cryptosporidiosis.Parasites & vectors · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. UnderstandingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Sandra NoackBoehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
H David ChapmanDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Paul M SelzerBoehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. paul.selzer@boehringer-ingelheim.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-2636
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coccidiosis is a parasitic disease of a wide variety of animals caused by coccidian protozoa. The coccidia are responsible for major economic losses of the livestock industry. For example, the annual cost due to coccidiosis to the global poultry industry has been estimated to exceed US$ 3 billion annually. Currently available drugs for the control of this disease are either polyether ionophorous antibiotics that are derived from fermentation products, or synthetic compounds, produced by chemical synthesis. Unfortunately, no new drugs in either category have been approved for use for decades. Resistance has been documented for all those of the drugs currently employed and therefore the discovery of novel drugs with unique modes of action is imperative if chemotherapy is to remain the principal means to control this disease. This chapter aims to give an overview of the efficacy and mode of action of the current compounds used to control coccidiosis in livestock and provides a brief outlook of research needs for the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoccidiaCoccidiosisCoccidiostatsLivestockPoultryPoultry DiseasesCoccidiostatsAnticoccidialsChemicalsCoccidiosisIonophoresLivestockMode of actionResistance

Identifiers

PMID31152233
PMCPMC6611755
OpenAlexW2946972596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.