Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152212›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2019

Bone age determination in eutrophic, overweight and obese Brazilian children and adolescents: a comparison between computerized BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods.

Thiago O Artioli, Matheus A Alvares, Vanessa S Carvalho Macedo, Tatiane S Silva, Roberto Avritchir, Cristiane Kochi, Carlos A Longui

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Artificial intelligence algorithm for bone age estimation].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  3. The Metacarpophalangeal Pattern Profile: An Old Method With New Insights Into the Evaluation of Short Stature.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  4. Assessing skeletal maturity in a UK modern female population.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Traditional and New Methods of Bone Age Assessment-An OverviewJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2021
    Article
  13. Important Tools for Use by Pediatric Endocrinologists in the Assessment of Short StatureJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thiago O ArtioliPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus A AlvaresPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa S Carvalho MacedoPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiane S SilvaMolecular Medicine Laboratory, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, 112 Dr. Cesário Mota Jr. St., São Paulo, CEP 01221-020, Brazil.
Roberto AvritchirDepartment of Radiology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiane KochiPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos A LonguiPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. carloslongui@msn.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6361-5235
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone age determination is usually employed to evaluate growth disorders and their treatment. The Greulich-Pyle method is the simplest and most frequently used type of evaluation, but it presents huge interobserver variability. The BoneXpert is a computer-automated method developed to avoid significant bone age variability among distinct observers.

objectiveTo compare the BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods of bone age determination in eutrophic children and adolescents, as well as in overweight and obese pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe sample comprised 515 participants, 253 boys (159 eutrophic, 53 overweight and 41 obese) and 262 girls (146 eutrophic, 76 overweight and 40 obese). Left hand and wrist radiographs were acquired for bone age determination using both methods.

resultsThere was a positive correlation between chronological age and Greulich-Pyle, chronological age and BoneXpert, and Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) in bone age in both the Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert methods in obese boys when compared to eutrophic or overweight boys of the same age. In girls, there was an increase in bone age in both obese and overweight individuals when compared to eutrophic girls (P<0.05). The Greulich-Pyle bone age was advanced in comparison to that of BoneXpert in all groups, except in obese boys, in which bone age was similarly advanced in both methods.

conclusionThe BoneXpert computer-automated bone age determination method showed a significant positive correlation with chronological age and Greulich-Pyle. Furthermore, the impact of being overweight or obese on bone age could be identified by both methods.

Indexed as

ObesityOverweightThinnessAdolescentAge Determination by SkeletonBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHandHumansMaleProspective StudiesWristBone ageBoneXpertChildrenGreulich-PyleHandObesityRadiographWrist

Identifiers

PMID31152212
OpenAlexW2947324688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.