Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152210›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019

Cardiovascular dynamics during head-up tilt assessed via pulsatile and non-pulsatile models.

Nakeya D Williams, Renee Brady, Steven Gilmore, Pierre Gremaud, Hien T Tran, Johnny T Ottesen, Jesper Mehlsen, Mette S Olufsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seven Mathematical Models of Hemorrhagic Shock.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nakeya D WilliamsMathematical Sciences Department, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
Renee BradyDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Steven GilmoreDepartment of Mathematics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Pierre GremaudDepartment of Mathematics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Hien T TranDepartment of Mathematics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Johnny T OttesenDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Jesper MehlsenSurgical Pathophysiology Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette S OlufsenDepartment of Mathematics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. msolufse@ncsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-0044

Funding

The Virtual Physiological Rat ProjectP50GM094503 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2011 to 2015
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM094503NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM094503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops non-pulsatile and pulsatile models for the prediction of blood flow and pressure during head-up tilt. This test is used to diagnose potential pathologies within the autonomic control system, which acts to keep the cardiovascular system at homeostasis. We show that mathematical modeling can be used to predict changes in cardiac contractility, vascular resistance, and arterial compliance, quantities that cannot be measured but are useful to assess the system's state. These quantities are predicted as time-varying parameters modeled using piecewise linear splines. Having models with various levels of complexity formulated with a common set of parameters, allows us to combine long-term non-pulsatile simulations with pulsatile simulations on a shorter time-scale. We illustrate results for a representative subject tilted head-up from a supine position to a [Formula: see text] angle. The tilt is maintained for 5 min before the subject is tilted back down. Results show that if volume data is available for all vascular compartments three parameters can be identified, cardiovascular resistance, vascular compliance, and ventricular contractility, whereas if model predictions are made against arterial pressure and cardiac output data alone, only two parameters can be estimated either resistance and contractility or resistance and compliance.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHemodynamicsModels, CardiovascularPulsatile FlowSupine PositionAdultCardiac OutputHeart RateHumansMaleTilt-Table TestVascular ResistanceCardiovascular dynamics modelingHead-up tiltOrthostatic intoleranceParameter estimationPulsatile versus non-pulsatile modeling

Identifiers

PMID31152210
PMCPMC10353701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.