ArticleDiabetologia2019
Sex differences in the association between socioeconomic status and diabetes prevalence and incidence in China: cross-sectional and prospective studies of 0.5 million adults.
Article in Diabetologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breastfeeding and risk of maternal type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study of 280 000 women in China.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Multidimensional health poverty among diabetic adults in China: evidence from the China Kadoorie Biobank.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Prediabetes, diabetes, and the risk of progression to diabetes among working population in Beijing-the Tongren HealthCare Study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Examining the reversal hypothesis on socioeconomic status and noncommunicable diseases, and gender disparities in China: a nationwide longitudinal analysis between 1991 and 2020.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Comparative diabetes mellitus burden trends across global, Chinese, US, and Indian populations using GBD 2021 database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Low education and employment status drive cardiometabolic health: a social determinants perspective in Chinese population.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Diabetes in China: epidemiology, pathophysiology and multi-omics.Nature metabolism · 2025 · on this mapReview
- [Adaptive Regulation of Glucose Metabolism and Diseases in High-Altitude Areas].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Review
- Gender Disparities in the Association Between Educational Attainment and Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Association of social determinants, lifestyle, and metabolic factors with mortality in Chinese adults: A nationwide 10-year prospective cohort study.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Is gender a factor in socioeconomic disparities in undiagnosed, and untreated hypertension in Bangladesh?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Sex differences in the association between socioeconomic status and untreated hypertension among residents with hypertension in rural Khánh Hòa, Vietnam: a post-hoc analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Sex differences in type 2 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2023Review
- Social inequalities in all-cause mortality among adults with multimorbidity: a 10-year prospective study of 0.5 million Chinese adults.International health · 2023Article
- The Interaction Between Age and Risk Factors for Diabetes and Prediabetes: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Article
- Sex differences in predictive factors for onset of type 2 diabetes in Japanese individuals: A 15-year follow-up study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2023Article
- Obesity mediates the opposite association of education and diabetes in Chinese men and women: Results from the REACTION study.Journal of diabetes · 2022Article
- Influence of Educational Level and Healthy Habits on the Prevalence of Diabesity in a Spanish Working Population.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Pathophysiology, phenotypes and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indian and Chinese populations.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022Review
- Sex differences in factors associated with prediabetes in Korean adults.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisChina has undergone rapid socioeconomic transition accompanied by lifestyle changes that are expected to have a profound impact on the health of its population. However, there is limited evidence from large nationwide studies about the relevance of socioeconomic status (SES) to risk of diabetes. We describe the associations of two key measures of SES with prevalent and incident diabetes in Chinese men and women.
methodsThe China Kadoorie Biobank study included 0.5 million adults aged 30-79 years recruited from ten diverse areas in China during 2004-2008. SES was assessed using the highest educational level attained and annual household income. Prevalent diabetes was identified from self-report and plasma glucose measurements. Incident diabetes was identified from linkage to disease and death registries and national health insurance claim databases. We estimated adjusted ORs and HRs for prevalent and incident diabetes associated with SES using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively.
resultsAt baseline, 30,066 (5.9%) participants had previously diagnosed (3.1%) or screen-detected (2.8%) diabetes among 510,219 participants included for cross-sectional analyses. There were 480,153 people without prevalent diabetes at baseline, of whom 9544 (2.0%) had new-onset diabetes during follow-up (median 7 years). Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for prevalent diabetes, comparing highest vs lowest educational level, were 1.21 (1.09, 1.35) in men and 0.69 (0.63, 0.76) in women; for incident diabetes, the corresponding HRs were 1.27 (1.07, 1.51) and 0.80 (0.67, 0.95), respectively. For household income, the adjusted ORs for prevalent diabetes, comparing highest vs lowest categories, were 1.45 (1.34, 1.56) in men and 1.26 (1.19, 1.34) in women; for incident diabetes, the HRs were 1.36 (1.19, 1.55) and 1.06 (0.95, 1.17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationAmong Chinese adults, the associations between education and diabetes prevalence and incidence differed qualitatively between men and women, whereas higher household income was positively associated with diabetes prevalence and incidence in both sexes, with a stronger relationship in men than in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.