Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152181›Full record

ArticleSleep2019

Neural reward processing in self-reported short sleepers: examination of gambling task brain activation in the Human Connectome Project database.

Brian J Curtis, Paula G Williams, Jeffrey S Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian J CurtisDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Paula G WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jeffrey S AndersonDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Atypical Late Neurodevelopment in Autism: A Longitudinal MRI and DTI StudyR01MH080826 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LAINHART, JANET ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2020
$6.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080826NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesMuch of what we assume about the effects of short sleep duration on neural reward processing derives from total sleep deprivation studies. Although total sleep deprivation appears rare, habitual short sleep is common: 30% of working US adults report habitually sleeping ≤ 6 hours/night. It remains largely unknown whether habitual short sleepers exhibit similar reward processing brain activation patterns to those observed following total sleep deprivation in prior studies. Therefore, our aim was to test objectively reward processing brain activation patterns associated with self-reported habitual short sleep duration in a large sample.

methodsNine hundred and fifty-two adult participants from the Human Connectome Project database were grouped on reported habitual short (≤6 hours) vs. medium-length (7-9 hours) sleep duration using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Reward processing brain activation was examined using a gambling task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Subject-level covariates for age, sex, continuous sleep duration, daytime dysfunction, and PSQI total score are provided as supplemental analyses.

resultsBrain activation patterns revealed expected reward processing-related activation for age and sex. However, activation for sleep duration, dysfunction, and PSQI score did not correspond to those evident in previous total sleep deprivation studies.

conclusionsSelf-reported short sleep duration, perceived sleep-related dysfunction, and sleep quality via PSQI do not appear to be meaningfully associated with activation in well-described regions of the human neurobiological reward circuit. As these findings are counter to prior results using experimental sleep deprivation, future work focused on more direct comparisons between self-reported sleep variables and experimental sleep deprivation appears warranted.

Indexed as

RewardAdultBrainConnectomeDecision MakingFemaleGamblingGoalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSelf ReportSleepSleep DeprivationSleep Wake DisordersTime FactorsfMRIhabitual short sleep durationreward processingtotal sleep deprivation

Identifiers

PMID31152181
PMCPMC7458276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.