Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31152138›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Reto S Wijker, Alex L Sessions, Tobias Fuhrer, Michelle Phan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Time-integrated δThe New phytologist · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hydrogen isotope fractionation is controlled by COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Large enrichments in fatty acidProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Reto S WijkerDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; rwijker@caltech.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-9849
Alex L SessionsDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Tobias FuhrerInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5006-6874
Michelle PhanDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
California Institute of Technology · USETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hydrogen-isotopic compositions (

Indexed as

Agrobacterium tumefaciensBacillus subtilisDeuteriumEscherichia coliHeterotrophic ProcessesHydrogenLipid MetabolismLipidsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysNADPPseudomonas fluorescensRhizobiaceaeDeuteriumHydrogenLipidsNADPfatty acidsfractionationhydrogen isotopesmetabolic flux analysisNADPH

Identifiers

PMID31152138
PMCPMC6589753
OpenAlexW2946833337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.