Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151783›Full record

ArticleJournal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology2022

Upper extremity function in the free living environment of adults with traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

Christina M Webber, Alexander Y Shin, Kenton R Kaufman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Real-World Evidence-Based Outcomes to Measure Upper Extremity Activity in The Brachial Plexus Injury Population.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Trends and advancements in shoulder biomechanics research.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Effects of elbow immobilization on upper extremity activity.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina M WebberMayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Alexander Y ShinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Kenton R KaufmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: Kaufman.kenton@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Musculoskeletal Research Training ProgramT32AR056950 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer J Westendorf · 2009 to 2026
$7.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transition of data acquisition out of the laboratory, into the real world offers a previously inaccessible perspective of physical function. This proves to be beneficial when assessing surgical intervention, especially after a traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) causing loss of motor function in an upper extremity (UE). Moving towards the use of real world data in clinical practice as an outcome measure, this study developed a method to report bilateral UE activity in patients with BPI. Three groups of ten subjects each participated in this study-healthy controls, subjects with traumatic BPI prior to surgical treatment (pre-), and subjects who had surgical reconstruction to treat BPI (post-). Subjects wore four activity monitors on bilateral forearms and upper arms for four days. Tri-axial acceleration data were used to calculate asymmetry indices for forearm and upper arm usage. Analysis revealed a bimodal distribution in the post- group, prompting division of this group into two subgroups based on injury type: pan-plexus and upper trunk. While median asymmetry indices at the forearm and upper arm were decreased in the post- group when compared to the pre- group, these differences were not significant. Compared to controls, the pre-surgery group (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) and post-surgery group with pan-plexus injuries (p = 0.0074, p = 0.0242) both exhibited statistically significant differences in forearm and upper arm asymmetry, respectively. Further investigation to establish clinically significant differences in asymmetry index is warranted. Importantly, analyzing the activity of UEs following treatment of a BPI provides objective real world evidence of function.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusMuscle, SkeletalAdultArmHumansTorsoUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID31151783
PMCPMC6874735
OpenAlexW2944827162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.