Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151774›Full record

ArticleNeuron2019

Rapid Plasticity of Higher-Order Thalamocortical Inputs during Sensory Learning.

Nicholas J Audette, Sarah M Bernhard, Ajit Ray, Luke T Stewart, Alison L Barth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Functional reorganization of motor cortex connectivity during learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Medullary and C3-C4 propriospinal pathways underlying mammalian forelimb movement control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pathway-Specific Ultrastructure of Thalamocortical Synapses in Mouse Somatosensory Area S2.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J AudetteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sarah M BernhardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ajit RayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Luke T StewartDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Alison L BarthDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: albarth@andrew.cmu.edu.
Carnegie Mellon University · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Dynamic connectivity in neocortical networksR01NS088958 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTH, ALISON L · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neocortical circuits are sensitive to experience, showing both anatomical and electrophysiological changes in response to altered sensory input. We examined input- and cell-type-specific changes in thalamo- and intracortical pathways during learning using an automated, home-cage sensory association training (SAT) paradigm coupling multi-whisker stimulation to a water reward. We found that the posterior medial nucleus (POm) but not the ventral posterior medial (VPM) nucleus of the thalamus drives increased cortical activity after 24 h of SAT, when behavioral evidence of learning first emerges. Synaptic strengthening within the POm thalamocortical pathway was first observed at thalamic inputs to L5 and was not generated by sensory stimulation alone. Synaptic changes in L2 were delayed relative to L5, requiring 48 h of SAT to drive synaptic plasticity at thalamic and intracortical inputs onto L2 Pyr neurons. These data identify the POm thalamocortical circuit as a site of rapid synaptic plasticity during learning and suggest a temporal sequence to learning-evoked synaptic changes in the sensory cortex.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsLearningMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalNeuronal PlasticityNonlinear DynamicsRange of Motion, ArticularSensory Receptor CellsSomatosensory CortexThalamusVibrissae

Identifiers

PMID31151774
PMCPMC10038228
OpenAlexW2947032026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.