Trial reportBMC health services research2019
TIME to reduce agitation in persons with dementia in nursing homes. A process evaluation of a complex intervention.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02655003 (TIME - Targeted Interdisciplinary Model for Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropscyhiatric Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TIME - Targeted Interdisciplinary Model for Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropscyhiatric Symptoms
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Testing the Implementation of Function-focused Care in Assisted Living Settings.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021Trial
- Process evaluation of the implementation of a decision support system to prevent and treat disease-related malnutrition in a hospital setting.BMC health services research · 2021Trial
- Do process evaluations open up the 'black box' of implementation interventions in health care? A scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- An organisation working mainly reactively instead of proactively: a qualitative study of how frail users of home care services and their next of kin experience crises.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- How and why does it work? A video-based qualitative analysis of case conferences to reduce BPSD through the lens of Habermas's theory of communicative action.BMC psychiatry · 2024Observational
- Article
- Alzheimer's disease research progress in the Mediterranean region: The Alzheimer's Association International Conference Satellite Symposium.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022Review
- Contextual factors influencing complex intervention research processes in care homes: a systematic review and framework synthesis.Age and ageing · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of impact and contextual aspects of a dementia special care unit in long-term care: a process evaluation.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Types of implementation of the dementia-specific case conference concept WELCOME-IdA in nursing homes: a qualitative process evaluation of the FallDem effectiveness trial.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Factors associated with staff-to-resident abuse in Norwegian nursing homes: a cross-sectional exploratory study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Article
- Resident-to-resident aggression in Norwegian nursing homes: a cross-sectional exploratory study.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Targeted Intervention Interdisciplinary Model for Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (TIME) has recently in a three-month cluster randomised controlled trial demonstrated reduction in agitation in nursing home residents with dementia. To ease replication and future implementation, and to clarify possible causal mechanisms, we performed a process evaluation of the intervention based on the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance).
methodsAn exploratory and a quasi-experimental design with mixed methods were used. The RE-AIM dimensions were explored by questionnaires to 807 staff members and 46 leading ward nurses in both the intervention nursing homes (INH) and the control nursing homes (CNH), before the start of the trial (baseline), and six and 12 months later. These questionnaires assessed data regarding the reach, effectiveness (staff level) and adoption dimensions. To assess implementation, we used a checklist for performance of the main components in TIME and analysed the minutes from 84 case conferences in the INH. To explore adoption and maintenance, five focus group interviews with 32 participants from the staff in the INH were conducted three to 6 months after the end of the trial.
resultsReach: On average 61% (SD 22) of the staff in each ward in the INH attended the training sessions. Effectiveness at staff level: There were no between-group differences throughout the study period for attitudes towards dementia, perceived competence or perception of mastery and social interaction. Adoption: 16 of the 17 INH completed the intervention. IMPLEMENTATION: 75% or more of the components of TIME were performed for 91% of the included residents. Maintenance: Most of the nursing homes used TIME three to 6 months after the end of the trial. An easy to grasp model and an engaged leadership facilitated the intervention and maintenance.
conclusionsA high degree of reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance contributed to the effectiveness of TIME at resident level. One other causal assumption of the effectiveness of TIME is the development in the staff of a new, shared and situated knowledge about each individual resident, not reflected by measurements in general knowledge and attitudes.
trial registrationThe trial was registered January 6, 2016 with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02655003 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.