Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151436›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2019

Autologous stem cell transplantation in refractory Crohn's disease - low intensity therapy evaluation (ASTIClite): study protocols for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and observational follow up study.

John A Snowden, Chris Hawkey, Daniel Hind, Lizzie Swaby, Katie Mellor, Richard Emsley, Laura Mandefield, Ellen Lee, Manuela Badoglio, Emmanuelle Polge and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

John A SnowdenDepartment of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Chris HawkeyNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Daniel HindClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lizzie SwabyClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. e.a.swaby@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-7681
Katie MellorClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Richard EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Laura MandefieldClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ellen LeeClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Manuela BadoglioEuropean Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle PolgeEuropean Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris, France.
Myriam LabopinEuropean Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris, France.
John GribbenCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.
A Graham PockleyJohn van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Gemma A FouldsJohn van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Alan LoboDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Simon TravisTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Miles ParkesDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jack SatsangiTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Diana PapaioannouClinical Trials Research Unit, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
James O LindsayCentre for Immunobiology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation In Refractory CD - Low Intensity Therapy Evaluation Study Investigators
European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP)
European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · FRQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health EME/15/178/09Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme 15/178/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD) is caused by mucosal immune system reactivity to luminal antigen and results in debilitating symptoms, reduced quality of life, impaired work productivity and significant health care costs. Not all patients respond to conventional and biologic therapies, with chronic inflammation ensuing. Although surgical resection may be required, disease frequently returns and surgery may not be an option, or may be declined. Case reports suggest potential benefit after haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for patients with refractory CD. The ASTIC trial asked whether HSCT could cure CD. Few patients achieved the primary endpoint of clinical remission for 3 months, off all medication with no evidence of active disease, and there were a high number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including one patient death. However, beneficial effects were observed in some aspects of disease activity. The ASTIClite trial will investigate these potential benefits and safety using a lower intensity regimen than ASTIC.

methodsNinety-nine participants will be recruited from secondary care IBD centres in the UK into a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT, ASTIClite) and an observational follow-up, and randomised to autologous HSCT versus standard care (ratio 2:1). The primary endpoint is treatment success at week 48, defined as mucosal healing without surgery or death. Secondary endpoints relating to efficacy, safety and mechanistic analyses will be evaluated at week 8, 14, 24, 32, 40 and 48. Long-term safety of the low intensity HSCT regimen forms the primary endpoint for the EBMT follow-up study and will be assessed annually for 4-7 years. DISCUSSION: ASTIClite will compare HSCTlite with standard care with respect to safety, efficacy and quality of life, and capture outcomes allowing findings to be generalised to current clinical practice in the UK. It will also provide significant mechanistic insights into the immunological consequences of HSCTlite and its impact on treatment outcomes. The observational follow-up will provide information, which is currently unavailable for this population.

trial registrationThe ASTIClite RCT was registered on 31st October 2017 ( ISRCTN17160440 ) and the EBMT follow-up study on 19th January 2018 ( ISRCTN31981313 ).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCrohn DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAutologous stem cell transplantCrohn’s diseaseObservational studyRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31151436
PMCPMC6544952
OpenAlexW2947831096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.