Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151401›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries - a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era.

Peter Waiswa, Monica Okuga, Lydia Kabwijamu, Joseph Akuze, Hanifah Sengendo, Patrick Aliganyira, Patricia Pirio, Claudia Hanson, Frank Kaharuza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter WaiswaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. pwaiswa@musph.ac.ug.
Monica OkugaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Lydia KabwijamuDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph AkuzeDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Hanifah SengendoSaving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick AliganyiraSaving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Kampala, Uganda.
Patricia PirioSaving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Kampala, Uganda.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frank KaharuzaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the greatest challenges that countries face regarding the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for child health regard the actions required to improve neonatal health; these interventions have to be informed by evidence. In view of the persisting high numbers of newborn deaths in Uganda, we aimed to define a locally contextualised national research agenda for newborn health to guide national investments towards SDG targets.

methodsWe adopted a systematic approach for priority-setting adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. We identified and listed local newborn researchers and experts in Uganda by reviewing the PubMed database, through a snowballing technique, and engaged the Ministry of Health. Participants were requested to generate at least three research questions. The collated questions were sent to the same expert group to be rated using five criteria, including answerability, scalability, impact, generalisability and speed.

findingsOf the 300 researchers and stakeholders contacted, 104 responded (36%) and generated 304 questions. These questions were collated and duplicates removed giving a condensed list of 41 research questions. These questions were then rated by 82 experts. Of the top 15 research questions, 86.7% (13/15) were in the service delivery and 6.7% (1/15) in the development domain, while only 6.7% (1/15) was in the group 'other'. None of the leading 15 questions was in the discovery domain. Strategies to improve quality of intrapartum care featured high in the responses, while research around care for premature babies was not a perceived focus of research.

conclusionsThe focus of improved evidence to guide and innovate service delivery, foremost intrapartum care, reflects the importance of this area as accelerated improvement is likely to yield fast and sustained survival gains in the neonatal period and beyond in Uganda. We recommend that other countries adapt a similar approach in defining priority reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health areas for investment in order to accelerate progress towards achieving the SDGs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesHealth PrioritiesHealth Services ResearchInfant HealthMaternal-Child Health ServicesChildChild HealthGoalsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePerinatal CareProgram DevelopmentSurveys and QuestionnairesSustainable DevelopmentNewborn research prioritiesresearch agendasetting prioritiesUganda

Identifiers

PMID31151401
PMCPMC6544968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.