ArticleBMC public health2019
Scoping review of the impacts of urban agriculture on the determinants of health.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community gardens and their effects on diet, health, psychosocial and community outcomes: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Cultivating connection between community, agriculture, food, and green space: A narrative review of agrihoods and their impact on health and wellbeing.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Practical Application of Ethical Research Principles: Developing and Implementing Grassroots Food Security Research With the Yarrabah Aboriginal Community.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Associations between home gardening and obstructive sleep apnoea: role of behavioural factors in the COMmunity-based Behaviour and Attitude Study in Tuvalu (COMBAT).Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Urban Nutrition in the Global South: A Narrative Review of Current Research.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024Review
- Linking Agricultural Activity Frequency to Loneliness in Rural Hospital Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Quantifying the relationship between gardening and health and well-being in the UK: a survey during the covid-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Prioritizing strategies for wheat biofortification: Inspiration from underutilized species.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Urban Agriculture in Thailand: Adoption Factors and Communication Guidelines to Promote Long-Term Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Social entrepreneurship in obesity prevention: A scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022Article
- A multi-scalar perspective on health and urban housing: an umbrella review.Buildings & cities · 2021Article
- Evidence for factors associated with diet and physical activity in African and Caribbean countries.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021Review
- Factors Correlated with Home Gardening in Gauteng Province, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Where birds felt louder: The garden as a refuge during COVID-19.Wellbeing, space and society · 2021Article
- A Systematic Review Protocol Investigating Community Gardening Impact Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere has been an increasing interest in urban agriculture (UA) practice and research in recent years. Scholars have already reported numerous beneficial and potential adverse impacts of UA on health-related outcomes. This scoping review aims to explore these impacts and identify knowledge gaps for future UA studies.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in seven electronic bibliographic databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize, collate, appraise the quality and make a narrative account of the findings.
resultsA total of 101 articles (51 quantitative, 29 qualitative, and 21 mixed methods studies) were included in our final analysis. Among these articles, 38 and 37% reported findings from North America and Sub-Saharan Africa respectively. Quantitative studies revealed evidence of positive impacts of UA on food security, nutrition outcomes, physical and mental health outcomes, and social capital. The qualitative studies reported a wide range of perceived benefits and motivations of UA. The most frequently reported benefits include contributions to social capital, food security, health and/or wellbeing. However, the evidence must be interpreted with caution since the quality of most of the studies was assessed as weak to moderate. While no definitive conclusions can be drawn about the adverse impacts of UA on health, paying particular attention to contamination of UA soil is recommended.
conclusionMore peer-reviewed studies are needed in areas where UA is practiced such as Latin America and Caribbean. The inconsistency and the lack of strong quality in the methodology of the included studies are proof that more rigorous studies are also needed in future research. Nevertheless, the substantial existing evidence from this review corroborate that UA can influence different determinants of health such as food security, social capital, health and well-being in a variety of contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.