Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151390›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

Use of financial incentives and text message feedback to increase healthy food purchases in a grocery store cash back program: a randomized controlled trial.

Anjali Gopalan, Pamela A Shaw, Raymond Lim, Jithen Paramanund, Deepak Patel, Jingsan Zhu, Kevin G Volpp, Alison M Buttenheim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02486588 (Increasing Engagement With the Vitality HealthyFood Benefit), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02486588 nacompletednot on this map

Increasing Engagement With the Vitality HealthyFood Benefit: A Randomized Field Trial Proposal

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2015 to 2017Enrolled7,314ConditionsPurchasing Behaviors, NutritionArmsMessaging, Financial incentives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anjali GopalanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA94612, USA. Anjali.Gopalan@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-1154
Pamela A ShawDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Raymond LimCenter for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jithen ParamanundDiscovery Vitality, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Deepak PatelDiscovery Vitality, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jingsan ZhuCenter for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kevin G VolppCenter for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alison M ButtenheimCenter for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Discovery Vitality N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe HealthyFood (HF) program offers members up to 25% cash back monthly on healthy food purchases. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested the efficacy of financial incentives combined with text messages in increasing healthy food purchases among HF members.

methodsMembers receiving the lowest (10%) cash back level were randomized to one of six arms: Arm 1 (Usual Care): 10% cash back, no weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 2: 10% cash back, generic weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 3: 10% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 4: 25% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 5: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; and, Arm 6: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, unbundled monthly text. In the 10 + 15%NET cash back, the cash back amount was the baseline 10% plus 15% of the net difference between healthy and unhealthy spending. The generic text included information on HF and healthy eating, while the personalized text had individualized feedback on purchases. The standard monthly text contained the cash back amount. The unbundled monthly text included the amount lost due to unhealthy purchases. The primary outcome was the average monthly percent healthy food spending. Secondary outcomes were the percent unhealthy food spending, and the percent healthy and unhealthy food items.

resultsOf the members contacted, 20 opted out, and 2841 met all inclusion criteria. There were no between-arm differences in the examined outcomes. The largest mean (standard deviation) difference in percent healthy spending was between Arm 1 (24.8% [11%]) and Arm 2 (26.8% [13%]), and the largest mean difference in percent unhealthy spending was also between Arm 1 (24.4% [20%]) and Arm 2 (21.7% [17%]), but no differences were statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

conclusionsNone of the tested financial incentive structures or text strategies differentially affected food purchasing. Notably, more than doubling the cash back amount and introducing a financial disincentive for unhealthy purchases did not affect purchasing. These findings speak to the difficulty of changing shopping habits and to the need for innovative strategies to shift complex health behaviors.

trial registrationNCT02486588 Increasing Engagement with a Healthy Food Benefit. The trial was prospectively registered on July 1, 2015.

Indexed as

FeedbackMotivationText MessagingAdultConsumer BehaviorDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationDietFinancial incentivesMessagingNutrition

Identifiers

PMID31151390
PMCPMC6544953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.