Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151217›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

D-Shaped POF Sensors for Refractive Index Sensing-The Importance of Surface Roughness.

Filipa Sequeira, Nunzio Cennamo, Alisa Rudnitskaya, Rogério Nogueira, Luigi Zeni, Lúcia Bilro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filipa SequeiraInstituto de Telecomunicações, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. fsequeira@av.it.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-6681-1282
Nunzio CennamoDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy. nunzio.cennamo@unicampania.it.
Alisa RudnitskayaCESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. alisa@ua.pt.
Rogério NogueiraInstituto de Telecomunicações, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. rnogueira@av.it.pt.
Luigi ZeniDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy. luigi.zeni@unicampania.it.
Lúcia BilroInstituto de Telecomunicações, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. lucia.bilro@av.it.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-8804-593X

Funding

This work is funded by FCT/MEC through national funds and when applicable co-funded by FEDER - PT2020 partnership agreement under the project INITIATE IF/01664/2014/CP1257/CT0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study the influence of the surface roughness on the transmission capacities of D-shaped plastic optical fibers (POFs) and sensors performance was investigated. Five D-shaped POF sensors were produced and characterized for refractive index sensing between 1.33 and 1.41. The sensors were characterized using a low-cost optical sensing system based on the variation of the transmitted light though the POF with refractive index changes (RI). Higher surface roughness increases the scattering losses through the POF and influences the sensors' performance; therefore, a balance must be attained. Generally, the best performance was achieved when the sensing region was polished with P600 sandpaper as a final polishing step. Polishing with sandpapers of lower grit size resulted in lower scattering, higher linearity of the sensor response and generally lower performance for RI sensing. A sensor resolution of 10

Indexed as

D-shaped POF sensorsintensity modulationlow-cost sensorsoptical fiber sensors (OFS)plastic optical fibers (POF)refractive index (RI) sensingsurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID31151217
PMCPMC6603787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.