Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31151158›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

DNA-Methylation-Based Detection of Urological Cancer in Urine: Overview of Biomarkers and Considerations on Biomarker Design, Source of DNA, and Detection Technologies.

Louise Katrine Larsen, Guro Elisabeth Lind, Per Guldberg, Christina Dahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma and their targeted therapies: a review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise Katrine LarsenDanish Cancer Society Research Center, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. louisekl@cancer.dk.
Guro Elisabeth LindDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway. Guro.Elisabeth.Lind@rr-research.no.
Per GuldbergDanish Cancer Society Research Center, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. perg@cancer.dk.
Christina DahlDanish Cancer Society Research Center, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. chd@cancer.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in DNA methylation have been causally linked with cancer and provide promising biomarkers for detection in biological fluids such as blood, urine, and saliva. The field has been fueled by genome-wide characterization of DNA methylation across cancer types as well as new technologies for sensitive detection of aberrantly methylated DNA molecules. For urological cancers, urine is in many situations the preferred "liquid biopsy" source because it contains exfoliated tumor cells and cell-free tumor DNA and can be obtained easily, noninvasively, and repeatedly. Here, we review recent advances made in the development of DNA-methylation-based biomarkers for detection of bladder, prostate, renal, and upper urinary tract cancers, with an emphasis on the performance characteristics of biomarkers in urine. For most biomarkers evaluated in independent studies, there was great variability in sensitivity and specificity. We discuss issues that impact the outcome of DNA-methylation-based detection of urological cancer and account for the great variability in performance, including genomic location of biomarkers, source of DNA, and technical issues related to the detection of rare aberrantly methylated DNA molecules. Finally, we discuss issues that remain to be addressed to fully exploit the potential of DNA-methylation-based biomarkers in the clinic, including the need for prospective trials and careful selection of control groups.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationDNA, NeoplasmGenetic TestingHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUrinalysisUrologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasmbisulfite conversionbladder cancerDNA methylation biomarkersnoninvasive detectionprostate cancerrenal cancerupper urinary tract cancerurological cancer

Identifiers

PMID31151158
PMCPMC6600406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.