ArticleJournal of neural engineering2019
A high-performance 4 nV (√Hz)
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust Removal of Slow Artifactual Dynamics Induced by Deep Brain Stimulation in Local Field Potential Recordings Using SVD-Based Adaptive Filtering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A New Implantable Closed-Loop Clinical Neural Interface: First Application in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Artefact-free recording of local field potentials with simultaneous stimulation for closed-loop Deep-Brain Stimulation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecording of local field potentials (LFPs) during deep brain stimulation (DBS) is necessary to investigate the instantaneous brain response to stimulation, minimize time delays for closed-loop neurostimulation and maximise the available neural data. To our knowledge, existing recording systems lack the ability to provide artefact-free high-frequency (>100 Hz) LFP recordings during DBS in real time primarily because of the contamination of the neural signals of interest by the stimulation artefacts. APPROACH: To solve this problem, we designed and developed a novel, low-noise and versatile analog front-end (AFE) that uses a high-order (8th) analog Chebyshev notch filter to suppress the artefacts originating from the stimulation frequency. After defining the system requirements for concurrent LFP recording and DBS artefact suppression, we assessed the performance of the realised AFE by conducting both in vitro and in vivo experiments using unipolar and bipolar DBS (monophasic pulses, amplitude ranging from 3 to 6 V peak-to-peak, frequency 140 Hz and pulse width 100 µs). A full performance comparison between the proposed AFE and an identical AFE, equipped with an 8th order analog Bessel notch filter, was also conducted. MAIN
resultsA high-performance, 4 nV ([Formula: see text]) SIGNIFICANCE: The designed AFE can precisely record LFP signals, in and without the presence of either unipolar or bipolar DBS, which renders it as a functional and practical AFE architecture to be utilised in a wide range of applications and environments. This work paves the way for the development of externalized research tools for closed-loop neuromodulation that use low- and higher-frequency LFPs as control signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.