Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150618›Full record

ReviewCell2019

Identifying Epistasis in Cancer Genomes: A Delicate Affair.

Joris van de Haar, Sander Canisius, Michael K Yu, Emile E Voest, Lodewyk F A Wessels, Trey Ideker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Network analysis of driver genes in human cancers.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fully accessible fitness landscape of oncogene-negative lung adenocarcinoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joris van de HaarDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Sander CanisiusDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Michael K YuDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Program in Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Emile E VoestDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
Lodewyk F A WesselsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD, the Netherlands. Electronic address: l.wessels@nki.nl.
Trey IdekerDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Program in Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Cancer Cell Map Initiative, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: tideker@ucsd.edu.

Funding

Using Networks to Seed Hierarchical Whole-cell Models of CancerU54CA209891 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ASHWORTH, ALAN · 2017 to 2021
$10.9M
Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01HG009979 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209891NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of the tumor genome seek to identify cancer pathways as groups of genes in which mutations are epistatic with one another or, specifically, "mutually exclusive." Here, we show that most mutations are mutually exclusive not due to pathway structure but to interactions with disease subtype and tumor mutation load. In particular, many cancer driver genes are mutated preferentially in tumors with few mutations overall, causing mutations in these cancer genes to appear mutually exclusive with numerous others. Researchers should view current epistasis maps with caution until we better understand the multiple cause-and-effect relationships among factors such as tumor subtype, positive selection for mutations, and gross tumor characteristics including mutational signatures and load.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyEpistasis, GeneticGenes, NeoplasmHumansModels, GeneticMutationNeoplasmsOncogenescancercancer genomeco-occurrenceepistasisgenomemutationmutation loadmutual exclusivitysubtypesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31150618
PMCPMC6816465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.