ReviewTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2019
3D bioprinting for lungs and hollow organs.
Review in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accessible Biofabrication of Anatomically Inspired Hollow and Branched Hydrogel Constructs by Soft Templating (Sof-T).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the hydrogels Matrigel, Biogelx, PLTMAx and GelMA in the generation of minilungs from human embryonic stem cells (hESC).Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Soft Robotics and Advanced Technologies for Minimally Invasive Bioprinting: The Future of Internal Organ Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Towards a bioengineered airway: advances in tracheal tissue engineering and biofabrication.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Lung Microphysiological System Validates Novel Cell Therapy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Advanced biology · 2026Article
- Tissue-Engineered Tracheal Reconstruction.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biomaterial-Based Additive Manufactured Composite/Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Comprehensive Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Engineering the 3D structure of organoids.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- Progress in Organ Bioprinting for Regenerative Medicine.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Advances in 3D bioprinting for urethral tissue reconstruction.Trends in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Review
- Application of tissue engineering techniques in tracheal repair: a bibliometric study.Bioengineered · 2023Article
- Regenerative medicine: current research and perspective in pediatric surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Review
- Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- What is the need and why is it time for innovative models for understanding lung repair and regeneration?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Multifunctional 3D platforms for rapid hemostasis and wound healing: Structural and functional prospects at biointerfaces.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- 3D Bioprinting of Human Hollow Organs.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2022Review
- Bioengineering lungs: An overview of current methods, requirements, and challenges for constructing scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Recent advances in biofabricated gut models to understand the gut-brain axis in neurological diseases.Frontiers in medical technology · 2022Review
- The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional bioprinting has been gaining attention as a potential method for creating biological tissues, supplementing the current arsenal of tissue engineering techniques. 3D bioprinting raises the possibility of reproducibly creating complex macro- and microscale architectures using multiple different cell types. This is promising for creation of multilayered hollow organs, which has been challenging using more traditional tissue engineering techniques. In this review, the state of the field in bioprinting of epithelialized hollow and tubular organs is discussed. Most of the progress for the pulmonary system has been restricted to the trachea. Due to the gross structural similarities and common engineering challenges when creating any epithelialized hollow organ, this review also covers current progress in printing within the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems, as well as applications of traditional plastic printing in engineering these tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.