Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150541›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

Evaluation of genotype quality parameters for SowPro90, a new genotyping array for swine1.

Hiruni R Wijesena, Gary A Rohrer, Dan J Nonneman, Brittney N Keel, Jessica L Petersen, Stephen D Kachman, Daniel C Ciobanu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiruni R WijesenaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Gary A RohrerUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE.
Dan J NonnemanUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE.
Brittney N KeelUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE.
Jessica L PetersenDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Stephen D KachmanDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Daniel C CiobanuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding early predictors of sow fertility has the potential to improve genomic predictions. A custom SNP array (SowPro90 produced by Affymetrix) was developed to include genetic variants overlapping quantitative trait loci for age at puberty, one of the earliest indicators of sow fertility, as well as variants related to innate and adaptive immunity. The polymorphisms included in the custom genotyping array were identified using multiple genomic approaches including deep genomic and transcriptomic sequencing and genome-wide associations. Animals from research and commercial populations (n = 2,586) were genotyped for 103,476 SNPs included in SowPro90. To assess the quality of data generated, genotype concordance was evaluated between the SowPro90 and Porcine SNP60 BeadArray using a subset of common SNP (n = 44,708) and animals (n = 277). The mean genotype concordance rate per SNP was 98.4%. Differences in distribution of data quality were observed between the platforms indicating the need for platform specific thresholds for quality parameters. The optimal thresholds for SowPro90 (≥97% SNP and ≥93% sample call rate) were obtained by analyzing the data quality distribution and genotype concordance per SNP across platforms. At ≥97% SNP call rate, there were 42,151 SNPs (94.3%) retained with a mean genotype concordance of 98.6% across platforms. Similarly, ≥94% SNPs and ≥85% sample call rates were established as thresholds for Porcine SNP60 BeadArray. At ≥94% SNPs call rate, there were 41,043 SNPs (91.8%) retained with a mean genotype concordance of 98.6% across platforms. Final evaluation of SowPro90 array content (n = 103,476) at ≥97% SNPs and ≥93% sample call rates allowed retention of 89,040 SNPs (86%) for downstream analysis. The findings and strategy for quality control could be helpful in identifying consistent, high-quality genotypes for genomic evaluations, especially when integrating genotype data from different platforms.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsCluster AnalysisDietFemaleGenetic VariationGenotypeOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproductionSexual MaturationSwinecustompigpubertyqualityreproductive longevitySNP genotypeSowPro90

Identifiers

PMID31150541
PMCPMC6667256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.