Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150524›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The pig transport network in Switzerland: Structure, patterns, and implications for the transmission of infectious diseases between animal holdings.

Martin Sterchi, Céline Faverjon, Cristina Sarasua, Maria Elena Vargas, John Berezowski, Abraham Bernstein, Rolf Grütter, Heiko Nathues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Outbreak detection for temporal contact data.Applied network science · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin SterchiDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1105-8780
Céline FaverjonVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cristina SarasuaDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maria Elena VargasDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
John BerezowskiVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3343-908X
Abraham BernsteinDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rolf GrütterSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Heiko NathuesClinic for Swine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topology of animal transport networks contributes substantially to how fast and to what extent a disease can transmit between animal holdings. Therefore, public authorities in many countries mandate livestock holdings to report all movements of animals. However, the reported data often does not contain information about the exact sequence of transports, making it impossible to assess the effect of truck sharing and truck contamination on disease transmission. The aim of this study was to analyze the topology of the Swiss pig transport network by means of social network analysis and to assess the implications for disease transmission between animal holdings. In particular, we studied how additional information about transport sequences changes the topology of the contact network. The study is based on the official animal movement database in Switzerland and a sample of transport data from one transport company. The results show that the Swiss pig transport network is highly fragmented, which mitigates the risk of a large-scale disease outbreak. By considering the time sequence of transports, we found that even in the worst case, only 0.34% of all farm-pairs were connected within one month. However, both network connectivity and individual connectedness of farms increased if truck sharing and especially truck contamination were considered. Therefore, the extent to which a disease may be transmitted between animal holdings may be underestimated if we only consider data from the official animal movement database. Our results highlight the need for a comprehensive analysis of contacts between farms that includes indirect contacts due to truck sharing and contamination. As the nature of animal transport networks is inherently temporal, we strongly suggest the use of temporal network measures in order to evaluate individual and overall risk of disease transmission through animal transportation.

Indexed as

TransportationAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesDisease OutbreaksFarmsHumansLivestockRisk FactorsSwineSwine DiseasesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID31150524
PMCPMC6544307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.