Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150479›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Study of the potential adverse effects caused by the dermal application of Dillenia indica L. fruit extract standardized to betulinic acid in rodents.

Flávia S Fernandes, Gustavo S da Silva, Alexandre S Hilel, Ana C Carvalho, Karina V T Remor, Aline D Schlindwein, Luiz A Kanis, Daniel F Martins, Maicon R Kviecinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flávia S FernandesUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Gustavo S da SilvaUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4571-2426
Alexandre S HilelUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Ana C CarvalhoUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Karina V T RemorUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Aline D SchlindweinUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Luiz A KanisUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Daniel F MartinsUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Maicon R KviecinskiUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6703-4040
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the potential adverse effects of the dermal administration of Dillenia indica Linnaeus (D. indica) fruit extract in healthy rodents; the extract was standardized to betulinic acid. In the initial phase, the acute effects were evaluated on the skin application site of a single extract dose. A skin irritation test was performed in male Wistar rats (n = 8/group) receiving the extract (50-150 mg/mL) with betulinic acid (0.5-1.5%, respectively). A photosensitivity test was performed in male BALB/c mice (n = 6/group) receiving the extract (150 mg/mL). Afterwards, other BALB/c mice (n = 20, male:female, 1:1) were used to assess the systemic alterations caused by 14 daily repeated doses (150 mg/mL) by monitoring the effects on mortality, body morphology, behavior, nutrition status, neuromotor reactions, organ morphology and weight, and blood tests. At this time, 0.5 mg/mL clobetasol was used as the positive control. The skin irritation index suggested that negligible skin irritation had occurred, even when the extract was applied to the rat skin at 150 mg/mL. However, the extract acted as a photosensitizer on mouse skin, showing a photosensitizing activity close to that of 10 mg/mL 5-methoxypsoralen. Repeated doses caused no mouse mortality, aggressiveness, piloerection, diarrhea, convulsions, neuromotor alterations or nutrition status changes. The mouse organ weights did not change, and the mice did not have alterations in their blood compositions. Clobetasol caused a reduction in the mononuclear leukocyte numbers. In general, the data suggest that the extract was safe in healthy rodents but indicate that caution should be taken with the photosensitizing activity; in addition, this activity should be further explored as it may be useful for phototherapeutic drug development.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsBetulinic AcidClobetasolDilleniaceaeFruitHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMicePentacyclic TriterpenesPhotosensitizing AgentsPlant ExtractsRatsSkinSkin Irritancy TestsTriterpenesBetulinic AcidClobetasolPentacyclic TriterpenesPhotosensitizing AgentsPlant ExtractsTriterpenes

Identifiers

PMID31150479
PMCPMC6544281
OpenAlexW2947184229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.