Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Porcine model for the study of liver regeneration enhanced by non-invasive 13C-methacetin breath test (LiMAx test) and permanent portal venous access.

Eva-Maria Wittauer, Felix Oldhafer, Eva Augstein, Oliver Beetz, Moritz Kleine, Carsten Schumacher, Lion Sieg, Hendrik Eismann, Kai Johanning, André Bleich and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva-Maria WittauerReMediES, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Felix OldhaferReMediES, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-1985
Eva AugsteinReMediES, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Oliver BeetzReMediES, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Moritz KleineReMediES, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Carsten SchumacherDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lion SiegDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hendrik EismannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Kai JohanningDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
André BleichInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Florian Wolfgang Rudolf VondranReMediES, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite advances in perioperative management and surgical technique, postoperative liver failure remains a feared complication after hepatic resection. Various supportive treatment options are under current discussion, but lack of structured evaluation. We therefore established a porcine model of major liver resection to study regeneration after partial hepatectomy in a reliable and well-defined pre-clinical setting.

methodsMajor hepatectomy was performed on seven minipigs with the intention to set up a non-lethal but relevant transient impairment of liver function. For steady postoperative vascular access (e.g. for blood withdrawal, measurement of venous pressure), permanent catheters were implanted into the internal jugular and portal veins, respectively. Animals were followed up for 30 days; clinical and laboratory results were recorded in detail. Monitoring was enhanced by non-invasive determination of the maximum liver function capacity (LiMAx test). RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe established porcine model appeared suitable for evaluation of postoperative liver regeneration. Clinical characteristics and progression of liver function impairment as well as subsequent recovery were comparable to courses known from surgery in humans. Laboratory parameters (e.g. liver enzymes, bilirubin, INR, coagulation factor II) showed relevant derangements during postoperative days (POD) 0 to 3 followed by normalization until POD 7. Application of the LiMAx test was feasible in minipigs, again showing values comparable to humans and kinetics in line with obtained laboratory parameters. The exteriorized portal vein catheters enabled intra- and postoperative monitoring of portal venous pressures as well as easy access for blood withdrawal without relevant risk of postoperative complications.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnimalsBreath TestsCarbon IsotopesDisease Models, AnimalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHepatectomyHumansInjections, IntramuscularLiverLiver FailureLiver RegenerationMalePortal PressurePortal VeinAcetamidesCarbon-13Carbon Isotopesmethacetin

Identifiers

PMID31150446
PMCPMC6544243
OpenAlexW2947701335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.