Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150426›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Fruit and vegetable intake and bones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juliana E Brondani, Fabio V Comim, Liziane M Flores, Lígia Araújo Martini, Melissa O Premaor

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [The role of nutrition in osteoprotection].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nutrition and Osteoporosis Prevention.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Sociodemographic factors affecting the disease acceptance in the group of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana E BrondaniPós-graduação em Farmacologia, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Fabio V ComimPós-graduação em Farmacologia, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Liziane M FloresDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Lígia Araújo MartiniFaculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Melissa O PremaorPós-graduação em Farmacologia, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0770-9202
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough intake of fruits and vegetables seemed to have a protective effect on bone metabolism, its effect on fractures remains uncertain.

methodsA systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (PROSPERO: CRD42016041462) was performed. RCTs and cohort studies that evaluated the combined intake of fruits and vegetables in men and women aged over 50 years were included. We considered fractures as a primary outcome measure. Changes in bone markers were considered as secondary outcomes. The search strategy included the following descriptors: fruit, vegetables, vegetable products, bone and bones, bone fractures, postmenopausal osteoporosis, and osteoporosis. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were the databases used. The appraisal of the studies was performed by two independent reviewers, and discussed and agreed upon by both examiners. The data extracted from the RCTs and cohort studies were summarized separately. The risks of fractures were combined across studies using random models. Bone resorption marker (CTx) was summarized with standardized mean differences. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was used to evaluate the strength of recommendations.

resultsOf the 1,192 studies screened, 13 articles were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the pooled analysis (6 cohort studies and 4 RCTs). The six cohort studies included in the meta-analysis included a population of 225,062. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of the hip in five studies was 0.92 (0.87, 0.98). Its heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 55.7%, p = 0.060), GRADE (⊕⊕⊕O). Two cohort studies evaluated the risk of any fracture; the HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96), with aheterogeneity of 24.9% (p = 0.249, GRADE (⊕⊕⊕O)). There was no association between the bone resorption marker CTx and 3 months of fruit and vegetable intake evaluated by four RCTs, GRADE (⊕⊕O O).

conclusionThere was an association between the increase of at least one serving of fruits and vegetables per day and decreases in the risk of fractures. The level of evidence for this association is moderate.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesFeeding BehaviorFractures, BoneHumansIncidenceOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID31150426
PMCPMC6544223
OpenAlexW2947378613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.