Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia.

Tannia Tembo, Michelo Simuyandi, Kanema Chiyenu, Anjali Sharma, Obvious N Chilyabanyama, Clara Mbwili-Muleya, Mazyanga Lucy Mazaba, Roma Chilengi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recent epidemiological and management approaches for cholera in India.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Cost of Cholera for Households and Health Facilities, Somalia.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pharmacoeconomics in Africa: needs, prospect and challenges.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tannia TemboCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-3800-371X
Michelo SimuyandiCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-7348-2835
Kanema ChiyenuCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Anjali SharmaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Obvious N ChilyabanyamaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Clara Mbwili-MuleyaLusaka District Health Office/ Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mazyanga Lucy MazabaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
Roma ChilengiCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2016, for the very first time, the Ministry of Health in Zambia implemented a reactive outbreak response to control the spread of cholera and vaccinated at-risk populations with a single dose of Shancol-an oral cholera vaccine (OCV). This study aimed to assess the costs of cholera illness and determine the cost-effectiveness of the 2016 vaccination campaign. METHODOLOGY: From April to June 2017, we conducted a retrospective cost and cost-effectiveness analysis in three peri-urban areas of Lusaka. To estimate costs of illness from a household perspective, a systematic random sample of 189 in-patients confirmed with V. cholera were identified from Cholera Treatment Centre registers and interviewed for out-of-pocket costs. Vaccine delivery and health systems costs were extracted from financial records at the District Health Office and health facilities. The cost of cholera treatment was derived by multiplying the subsidized cost of drugs by the quantity administered to patients during hospitalisation. The cost-effectiveness analysis measured incremental cost-effectiveness ratio-cost per case averted, cost per life saved and cost per DALY averted-for a single dose OCV.

resultsThe mean cost per administered vaccine was US$1.72. Treatment costs per hospitalized episode were US$14.49-US$18.03 for patients ≤15 years old and US$17.66-US$35.16 for older patients. Whereas households incurred costs on non-medical items such as communication, beverages, food and transport during illness, a large proportion of medical costs were borne by the health system. Assuming vaccine effectiveness of 88.9% and 63%, a life expectancy of 62 years and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of US$1,500, the costs per case averted were estimated US$369-US$532. Costs per life year saved ranged from US$18,515-US$27,976. The total cost per DALY averted was estimated between US$698-US$1,006 for patients ≤15 years old and US$666-US$1,000 for older patients.

conclusionOur study determined that reactive vaccination campaign with a single dose of Shancol for cholera control in densely populated areas of Lusaka was cost-effective.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesCholera Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31150406
PMCPMC6544210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.