Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150144›Full record

SynthesisJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020

Dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion in diagnosing recurrent brain metastases after radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robert M Kwee, Thomas C Kwee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert M KweeDepartment of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen/Sittard/Geleen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7760-867X
Thomas C KweeDepartment of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in discriminating treatment-related changes from recurrence in irradiated brain metastases is currently not completely clear. PURPOSE: To systematically review the accuracy of DSC MR perfusion in diagnosing recurrent brain metastases after radiotherapy. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SUBJECTS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for original studies investigating the accuracy of DSC MR perfusion in diagnosing recurrent brain metastases after radiotherapy. Ten studies, comprising a total of more than 271 metastases, were included. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T or 3.0T, DSC MR perfusion. ASSESSMENT: Quality assessment was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. STATISTICAL TESTS: Sensitivity and specificity were pooled with a bivariate random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by a chi-squared test. Potential sources for heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analyses.

resultsIn seven studies the diagnostic criterion was not prespecified. In eight studies it was unclear whether the reference standard was interpreted blindly. In seven studies it was unclear whether DSC MR perfusion results influenced which reference standard was used. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.6%, 89.1%) and 80.6% (95% CI: 64.2%, 90.6%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity in both sensitivity (P = 0.005) and specificity (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in relative diagnostic odds ratio according to publication year, country of origin, study size, and DSC MR perfusion interpretation method (visual analysis of cerebral blood volume [CBV] map vs. relative CBV measurement) (P > 0.2). Due to insufficiently detailed reporting, it was not possible to investigate the influence of primary tumor origin on accuracy. DATA

conclusionOur results suggest that the accuracy of DSC MR perfusion in diagnosing recurrent brain metastases after radiotherapy is fairly high. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of methodological quality concerns and heterogeneity between studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:524-534.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPerfusionSensitivity and Specificitybrainmagnetic resonance imagingneoplasm metastasisperfusionrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID31150144
PMCPMC7004193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.