Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150110›Full record

ArticleCancer2019

Tumor downstaging as an intermediate endpoint to assess the activity of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Alberto Martini, Rachel Jia, Bart S Ferket, Nikhil Waingankar, Elizabeth R Plimack, Simon J Crabb, Lauren C Harshman, Evan Y Yu, Thomas Powles, Jonathan E Rosenberg and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Alberto MartiniDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1272-7154
Rachel JiaInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Bart S FerketInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Nikhil WaingankarDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4703-0074
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Simon J CrabbUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3521-9064
Lauren C HarshmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-1588
Evan Y YuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sumanta K PalCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1712-0848
Ulka N VaishampayanKarmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-4571
Andrea NecchiNational Institute for Tumors, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3007-2756
N Peter WiklundDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Reza MehrazinDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Madhu MazumdarInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
John P SfakianosDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Matthew D GalskyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USCity of Hope · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USQueen Mary University of London · GBTisch Hospital · USTumour Institute of Tuscany · ITUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Washington · USWayne State University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has been associated with improved overall survival (OS). This study was aimed at evaluating the impact of pathologic downstaging (pDS; ie, a pT stage at least 1 stage lower than the pre-NAC cT stage) on the OS of patients with MIBC treated with NAC.

methodsThe Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were queried for cT2-4N0M0 patients treated with NAC. A multivariable Cox model including either pDS or pCR was generated. A nested model was built to evaluate the added value of pDS (excluding patients achieving a pCR) to a model including pCR alone. C indices were computed to assess discrimination. NCDB was used for validation. The treatment effect of NAC versus cystectomy alone in achieving pDS was estimated through an inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment.

resultsOverall, 189 and 2010 patients from the RISC and NCDB cohorts, respectively, were included; pDS and pCR were achieved by 33% and 35% and by 20% and 15% in RISC and NCDB, respectively. In both data sets, pDS and pCR were associated with better OS and C indices. Adding pDS excluding pCR to the model with pCR fit the data better (likelihood ratio, P = .019 for RISC and P < .001 for NCDB), and it yielded better discrimination (incremental C index, 4.2 for RISC and 1.6 for NCDB). The treatment effect of NAC in achieving pDS was 2.07-fold (P < .001) in comparison with cystectomy alone.

conclusionsA decrease of at least 1 stage from the cT stage to the pT stage is associated with improved OS in patients with MIBC treated with NAC.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Transitional CellCisplatinCohort StudiesCystectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMuscle, SmoothNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinbladder cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyoverall survivalradical cystectomyurothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID31150110
PMCPMC6859003
OpenAlexW2947456133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.