Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150084›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Long-term Effects of Multimodal Treatment on Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: Follow-up Analysis of the COMPAS Trial.

Alexandra P Lam, Swantje Matthies, Erika Graf, Michael Colla, Christian Jacob, Esther Sobanski, Barbara Alm, Michael Rösler, Wolfgang Retz, Petra Retz-Junginger and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra P LamDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Swantje MatthiesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Erika GrafClinical Trials Unit, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Michael CollaClinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Christian JacobClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medius Clinic, Kirchheim, Germany.
Esther SobanskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Clinical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Barbara AlmDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Clinical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Michael RöslerInstitute for Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Wolfgang RetzInstitute for Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Petra Retz-JungingerInstitute for Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Bernhard KisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Mona Abdel-HamidDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Helge H O MüllerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Caroline LückeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Michael HussDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas JansCenter of Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Mathias BergerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ludger Tebartz van ElstDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexandra PhilipsenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Comparison of Methylphenidate and Psychotherapy in Adult ADHD Study (COMPAS) Consortium
University of Bonn · DESaarland University · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Knowledge about the long-term effects of multimodal treatment in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is much needed. Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of multimodal treatment for adult ADHD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observer-masked, 1.5-year follow-up of the Comparison of Methylphenidate and Psychotherapy in Adult ADHD Study (COMPAS), a prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial, compared cognitive behavioral group psychotherapy (GPT) with individual clinical management (CM) and methylphenidate (MPH) with placebo (2 × 2 factorial design). Recruitment started January 2007 and ended August 2010, and treatments were finalized in August 2011 with follow-up through March 2013. Overall, 433 adults with ADHD participated in the trial, and 256 (59.1%) participated in the follow-up assessment. Analysis began in November 2013 and was completed in February 2018. Interventions: After 1-year treatment with GPT or CM and MPH or placebo, no further treatment restrictions were imposed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in the observer-masked ADHD Index of Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale score from baseline to follow-up. Secondary outcomes included further ADHD rating scale scores, observer-masked ratings of the Clinical Global Impression scale, and self-ratings of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory. Results: At follow-up, 256 of 433 randomized patients (baseline measured in 419 individuals) participated. Of the 256 patients participating in follow-up, the observer-masked ADHD Index of Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale score was assessed for 251; the mean (SD) baseline age was 36.3 (10.1) years; 125 patients (49.8%) were men; and the sample was well-balanced with respect to prior randomization (GPT and MPH: 64 of 107; GPT and placebo: 67 of 109; CM and MPH: 70 of 110; and CM and placebo: 55 of 107). At baseline, the all-group mean ADHD Index of Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale score was 20.6, which improved to adjusted means of 14.2 for the GPT arm and 14.7 for the CM arm at follow-up with no significant difference between groups (difference, -0.5; 95% CI, -1.9 to 0.9; P = .48). The adjusted mean decreased to 13.8 for the MPH arm and 15.2 for the placebo arm (difference, -1.4; 95% CI, -2.8 to -0.1; P = .04). As in the core study, MPH was associated with a larger reduction in symptoms than placebo at follow-up. These results remained unchanged when accounting for MPH intake at follow-up. Compared with participants in the CM arm, patients who participated in group psychotherapy were associated with less severe symptoms as measured by the self-reported ADHD Symptoms Total Score according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) (DSM-IV) of Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale (AMD, -2.1; 95% CI, -4.2 to -0.1; P = .04) and in the subscale of reducing pure hyperactive symptoms, measured via the Diagnostic Checklist for the diagnosis of ADHD in adults (AMD, -1.3; 95% CI, -2.8 to 0.1; P = .08). Regarding the Clinical Global Impression scale assessment of effectiveness, the difference between GPT and CM remained significant at follow-up (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59; P = .04). No differences were found for any comparison concerning depression as measured with the Beck Depression Inventory. Conclusions and Relevance: Results from COMPAS demonstrate a maintained improvement in ADHD symptoms for adults 1.5 years after the end of a 52-week controlled multimodal treatment period. The results indicate that MPH treatment combined with GPT or CM provides a benefit lasting 1.5 years. Confirming the results of the core study, GPT was not associated with better results regarding the primary outcome compared with CM. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN54096201.

Indexed as

AdultAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMethylphenidateMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID31150084
PMCPMC6547099
OpenAlexW2947304001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.