Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31150009›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2019

Polypills for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Clara K Chow, Qingtao Meng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of polypills for CVD prevention.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Clara K ChowWestmead Applied Research Centre (WARC), University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. clara.chow@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-0038
Qingtao MengWestmead Applied Research Centre (WARC), University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypills can contain multiple pharmaceutical agents targeting the cardiovascular system. The use of polypills in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has received broad support; however, the use of polypills in the primary prevention of CVD is more controversial. This controversy stems from an inherent resistance to the medicalization of primary prevention, and the lower CVD event rate in this population means that smaller absolute benefits are derived. Indeed, drug-related adverse effects, such as from aspirin, might even outweigh the benefits. The role of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy for blood pressure (BP) lowering in combatting the widespread undertreatment of high BP - the leading modifiable risk factor contributing to the global burden of CVD - has gained momentum. Increasing evidence suggests that FDC pills containing multiple low doses of BP-lowering drugs produce more effective BP lowering than the use of fewer separate BP-lowering drugs at higher doses, without an increase in adverse effects. Trials of FDC pills comprising three half-dose or four quarter-dose BP-lowering drugs have shown substantial efficacy. In this Review, we summarize the current evidence on low-dose BP-lowering FDC pills and the justification for this approach in the context of polypills in the primary prevention of CVD.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseDrug CombinationsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypertensionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrimary PreventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeAntihypertensive AgentsAspirinDrug CombinationsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31150009
OpenAlexW2947488593

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.