Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31149954›Full record

SynthesisJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2019

Do Quality Improvement Initiatives Improve Outcomes for Patients in Antiretroviral Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.

Sally Hargreaves, Keiran Rustage, Laura B Nellums, Joshua E Bardfield, Bruce Agins, Pierre Barker, M Rashad Massoud, Nathan P Ford, Meg Doherty, Gillian Dougherty and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Quality of TB care among people living with HIV: Gaps and solutions.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sally HargreavesThe Insitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Keiran RustageThe Insitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura B NellumsThe Insitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Joshua E BardfieldHealthqual, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Bruce AginsHealthqual, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Pierre BarkerURC, Chevy Chase, MD.
M Rashad MassoudLLC/USAID ASSIST Project, University Research, Co, Bethesda, MD.
Nathan P FordDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Meg DohertyDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gillian DoughertyICAP, Columbia University.
Satvinder SinghDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHImperial College London · GBGlobal Brain Health Institute · USInstitute for Healthcare Improvement · USSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been a range of quality improvement (QI) and quality assurance initiatives in low- and middle-income countries to improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) treatment outcomes for people living with HIV. To date, these initiatives have not been systematically assessed and little is known about how effective, cost-effective, or sustainable these strategies are in improving clinical outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017071848), searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database of controlled trials for articles reporting on the effectiveness of QI and quality assurance initiatives in HIV programs in low- and middle-income countries in relation to ART uptake, retention in care, adherence, viral load suppression, mortality, and other outcomes including cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability.

resultsOne thousand eight hundred sixty articles were found, of which 29 were included. QI approaches were categorized as follows: (1) health system approaches using QI methods; (2) QI learning networks including collaboratives; (3) standard-based methods that use QI tools to improve performance gaps; and (4) campaigns using QI methods. The greatest improvements were seen in ART uptake [median increase of 14.0%; interquartile range (IQR) -9.0 to 29.3], adherence [median increase of 22.0% (IQR -7.0 to 25.0)], and viral load suppression [median increase 26.0% (IQR -8.0 to 26.0)].

conclusionsQI interventions can be effective in improving clinical outcomes; however, there was significant variability, making it challenging to identify which aspects of interventions lead to clinical improvements. Standardizing reporting and assessment of QI initiatives is needed, supported by national quality policies and directorates, and robust research.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesQuality ImprovementAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID31149954
PMCPMC6738622
OpenAlexW2947391192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.