ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2019
Magnitude-based Inference is not Bayesian and is not a valid method of inference.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Number of Sprint Repetitions in a Sprint Interval Training Session Does Not Moderate Improvements in V̇OScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Pooled it
- Call to increase statistical collaboration in sports science, sport and exercise medicine and sports physiotherapy.British journal of sports medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of the use of "magnitude-based inference" in sports science and medicine.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- A Narrative Review of the High-Carbohydrate Fueling Revolution (≥ 100 g/h) in the Professional Peloton.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Sports Metaresearch: An Emerging Discipline of Sport Science and Medicine.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Alternatives to the P value: connotations of significance.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Review
- Frequentist, Bayesian Analysis and Complementary Statistical Tools for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Fields: Are Traditional Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing Methods Sufficient?Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
- KeepRunning: A MoCap-Based Rapid Test to Prevent Musculoskeletal Running Injuries.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Defense of Hypothesis Testing: A Response to the Joint Editorial From the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors on Statistical Inference Through Estimation.Physical therapy · 2022Article
- Recommendations for the design of randomized controlled trials in strength and conditioning. Common design and data interpretation.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Effects of creatine monohydrate timing on resistance training adaptations and body composition after 8 weeks in male and female collegiate athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Replacing statistical significance and non-significance with better approaches to sampling uncertainty.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Review
- Comment on: 'Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices'.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Pacing and Performance in the 6 World Marathon Majors.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.