Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31149390›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2019

The role of invasive monitoring in the resuscitation of major burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lisa M Davenport, Geoffrey P Dobson, Hayley L Letson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Past, present, and future of critical burn treatment].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa M DavenportHeart, Trauma and Sepsis Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Queensland 4811, Australia.
Geoffrey P DobsonHeart, Trauma and Sepsis Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Queensland 4811, Australia.
Hayley L LetsonHeart, Trauma and Sepsis Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University Queensland 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly, in major hospitals invasive monitoring endpoints are utilised to guide the acute resuscitation of burns. The aim of this review is to evaluate effects of invasive monitoring for major burns patients (>20% total body surface area) to prevent early organ dysfunction. Five databases were searched for randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that evaluated invasive monitoring within the acute phase (first 24 hours). Invasive monitoring included transesophageal echocardiogram, central venous pressure measurement, and pulmonary artery catheterisation. Primary outcomes included multiple organ failure scores, renal and cardiac dysfunction measurements, compartment syndrome and lactate at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included mortality and intensive care unit stay. Ten studies involving 401 major burns patients were included. Data pooled from four studies demonstrated significantly improved cardiac index at 24 hours compared to non-invasive endpoints (MD: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.82,

Indexed as

Burnsfluid resuscitationinvasive monitoringorgan dysfunctionshocktrauma

Identifiers

PMID31149390
PMCPMC6526380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.