Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31149385›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2019

Joint retina segmentation and classification for early glaucoma diagnosis.

Jie Wang, Zhe Wang, Fei Li, Guoxiang Qu, Yu Qiao, Hairong Lv, Xiulan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie WangDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhe WangSenseTime Group Limited, Beijing, China.
Fei LiZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoxiang QuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yu QiaoShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Hairong LvDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiulan ZhangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a joint segmentation and classification deep model for early glaucoma diagnosis using retina imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Our motivation roots in the observation that ophthalmologists make the clinical decision by analyzing the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) from OCT images. To simulate this process, we propose a novel deep model that joins the retinal layer segmentation and glaucoma classification. Our model consists of three parts. First, the segmentation network simultaneously predicts both six retinal layers and five boundaries between them. Then, we introduce a post processing algorithm to fuse the two results while enforcing the topology correctness. Finally, the classification network takes the RNFL thickness vector as input and outputs the probability of being glaucoma. In the classification network, we propose a carefully designed module to implement the clinical strategy to diagnose glaucoma. We validate our method both in a collected dataset of 1004 circular OCT B-Scans from 234 subjects and in a public dataset of 110 B-Scans from 10 patients with diabetic macular edema. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves superior segmentation performance than other state-of-the-art methods both in our collected dataset and in public dataset with severe retina pathology. For glaucoma classification, our model achieves diagnostic accuracy of 81.4% with AUC of 0.864, which clearly outperforms baseline methods.

Identifiers

PMID31149385
PMCPMC6524599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.