ArticleBiomedical optics express2019
Accuracy and precision of tissue optical properties and hemodynamic parameters estimated by the BabyLux device: a hybrid time-resolved near-infrared and diffuse correlation spectroscopy neuro-monitor.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward comprehensive multimodal neuromonitoring of surrogates of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury: insights from a hyperventilation protocol.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Reliability of diffuse optical spectroscopies for evaluation of cerebral hemometabolic stress in children with sickle cell anemia.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- How the heterogeneity of the severely injured brain affects hybrid diffuse optical signals: case examples and guidelines.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide tension in newborns: data from combined time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy and diffuse correlation spectroscopy.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- First-in-clinical application of a time-gated diffuse correlation spectroscopy system at 1064 nm using superconducting nanowire single photon detectors in a neuro intensive care unit.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Precision of time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy-based measurements of cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants.Neurophotonics · 2021Article
- The LUCA device: a multi-modal platform combining diffuse optics and ultrasound imaging for thyroid cancer screening.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Time resolved speckle contrast optical spectroscopy at quasi-null source-detector separation for non-invasive measurement of microvascular blood flow.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Cerebral oxygenation and blood flow in normal term infants at rest measured by a hybrid near-infrared device (BabyLux).Pediatric research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have investigated the accuracy and precision of "the BabyLux device", a hybrid time-resolved near-infrared (TRS) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) neuro-monitor for the pre-term infant. Numerical data with realistic noise were simulated and analyzed using the BabyLux device as a reference system and different experimental and analysis parameters. The results describe the limits for the precision and the accuracy to be expected. The dependence of these limits on different experimental conditions and choices of the analysis method is also described. Experiments demonstrate comparable values for precision with respect to the simulation results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.